Cited by 90Soil and Unsaturated FlowSoil erosion and sediment transportGroundwater flow and contamination studies

Colloid mobilization in a fractured soil during dry–wet cycles: role of drying duration and flow path permeability

Mohanty, Sanjay K., Saiers, James E., Ryan, Joseph N.·2015·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

In subsurface soils, colloids are mobilized by infiltrating rainwater, but the source of colloids and the process by which colloids are generated between rainfalls are not clear. We examined the effect of drying duration and the spatial variation of soil permeability on the mobilization of in situ colloids in intact soil cores (fractured and heavily weathered saprolite) during dry-wet cycles. Measuring water flux at multiple sampling ports at the core base, we found that water drained through flow paths of different permeability. The duration of antecedent drying cycles affected the amount of mobilized colloids, particularly in high-flux ports that received water from soil regions with a large number of macro- and mesopores. In these ports, the amount of mobilized colloids increased with increased drying duration up to 2.5 days. For drying durations greater than 2.5 days, the amount of mobilized colloids decreased. In contrast, increasing drying duration had a limited effect on colloid mobilization in low-flux ports, which presumably received water from soil regions with fewer macro- and mesopores. On the basis of these results, we attribute this dependence of colloid mobilization upon drying duration to colloid generation from dry pore walls and distribution of colloids in flow paths, which appear to be sensitive to the moisture content of soil after drying and flow path permeability. The results are useful for improving the understanding of colloid mobilization during fluctuating weather conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.5b00889

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohanty, S. K., Saiers, J. E., & Ryan, J. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Mohanty, Sanjay K.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2015-07-15
Volume
49
Issue
15
Pages
9100-9106
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2434700571
Cited by
90
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE-FG02-08ER64639)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Keywords
colloid mobilization, wetting-drying cycles, drying time, saprolite, soil moisture, water flux, soil core
MeSH terms
Colloids, Desiccation, Particle Size, Permeability, Soil, Water, Water Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review