Macroscopic Evidence for the Hibernating Behavior of Materials Stock
Open accessAbstract
Hibernating stock is defined as material stock that is no longer used, but is not yet recovered. Although hibernating stock plays a role in materials recoverability, its contribution to the overall material cycle is not clearly understood. Therefore, an analysis of the time-series potential generation of steel scrap in Japan was performed and compared against the actual recovery, proving that the steel scrap recovered each year exceeds the annual generation potential and providing the first macroscopic evidence of hibernating stock recovery. These results indicate that hibernation behavior should be considered when evaluating materials recoverability. The particular characteristics of hibernating stock were also identified. These materials tend to be located far from scrap yards and/or have low bulk density, while also minimally obstructing new activity. In fact, hibernating materials are typically only recovered when they obstruct new activity. Hence, in order to increase steel recoverability, the recovery cost must be reduced. The end-of-life recycling rates (EoL-RRs) were also evaluated, and were found to exhibit a significant change over time. Consequently, the annual EoL-RR cannot be considered as a representative value, and a value for the EoL-RR(s) of relevant year(s) that has been evaluated over the entire period should be used instead.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 'lost stock' of construction materials mostly in sub-surface layers, including foundations, and the 'hibernating stock' in delipidated and abandoned construction provide additional potential for reuse and recycling of building material, but the limited value of the materials may constitute a major barrier.
“The 'lost stock' of construction materials mostly in sub-surface layers, including foundations, and the 'hibernating stock' in delipidated and abandoned construction provide additional potential for reuse and recycling of building material, but the limited value of the materials may constitute a major barrier [64,110,111].”
From Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—a review (2019) · cites this paper as [110]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 60
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- The Japan Ferrous Raw Materials Association. Quarterly Ferrous Raw Material Statistics/ Monthly Ferrous Raw Material Statistics, (1985, 1990, 1995, 2004).
- The Japan Ferrous Raw Materials Association. Quarterly Tetsugen, Vol. 1-49, (1999-2011).
- Authors
- Daigo, I., Iwata, K., Ohkata, I., & Goto, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Daigo, Ichiro
- ORCID
- Daigo, Ichiro
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-06-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 8691-8696
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2464473521
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26281056)
- Ministry of the Environment (S-6)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- steel scrap, material cycling, recovery cost
- MeSH terms
- Japan, Steel, Recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review