The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EDTA-Cross-Linked β-Cyclodextrin: An Environmentally Friendly Bifunctional Adsorbent for Simultaneous Adsorption of Metals and Cationic Dyes
Abstract
The discharge of metals and dyes poses a serious threat to public health and the environment. What is worse, these two hazardous pollutants are often found to coexist in industrial wastewaters, making the treatment more challenging. Herein, we report an EDTA-cross-linked β-cyclodextrin (EDTA-β-CD) bifunctional adsorbent, which was fabricated by an easy and green approach through the polycondensation reaction of β-cyclodextrin with EDTA as a cross-linker, for simultaneous adsorption of metals and dyes. In this setting, cyclodextrin cavities are expected to capture dye molecules through the formation of inclusion complexes and EDTA units as the adsorption sites for metals. The adsorbent was characterized by FT-IR, elemental analysis, SEM, EDX, ζ-potential, and TGA. In a monocomponent system, the adsorption behaviors showed a monolayer adsorption capacity of 1.241 and 1.106 mmol g(-1) for Cu(II) and Cd(II), respectively, and a heterogeneous adsorption capacity of 0.262, 0.169, and 0.280 mmol g(-1) for Methylene Blue, Safranin O, and Crystal Violet, respectively. Interestingly, the Cu(II)-dye binary experiments showed adsorption enhancement of Cu(II), but no significant effect on dyes. The simultaneous adsorption mechanism was further confirmed by FT-IR, thermodynamic study, and elemental mapping. Overall, its facile and green fabrication, efficient sorption performance, and excellent reusability indicate that EDTA-β-CD has potential for practical applications in integrative and efficient treatment of coexistenting toxic pollutants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review
Katheresan, V., Kansedo, J., & Lau, S. Y. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 · Cited by 2,752
Recent advances for dyes removal using novel adsorbents: A review
Zhou, Y., Lu, J., Zhou, Y., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.072 · Cited by 1,355
Polymer functionalized nanocomposites for metals removal from water and wastewater: An overview
Lofrano, G., Carotenuto, M., Libralato, G., Domingos, R. F., Markus, A., Dini, L., Gautam, R. K., Baldantoni, D., Rossi, M., Sharma, S. K., et al. (2016) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.033 · Cited by 350
Zhao, F., Yang, Z., Wei, Z., Spinney, R., Sillanpää, M., Tang, J., Tam, M., & Xiao, R. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.124307 · Cited by 120
Self-citationSong, K., Xu, H., Xu, L., Xie, K., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.070 · Cited by 110
Wang, G., Li, G., Huan, Y., Hao, C., & Chen, W. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127736 · Cited by 101
Mashkoor, F., & Nasar, A. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.015 · Cited by 80
Li, S., & Kang, Y. (2022) · Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.128109 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, F., Repo, E., Yin, D., Meng, Y., Jafari, S., & Sillanpää, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-08-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10570-10580
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2292913696
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.