Cited by 350Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

Polymer functionalized nanocomposites for metals removal from water and wastewater: An overview

Open access
Lofrano, Giusy, Carotenuto, Maurizio, Libralato, Giovanni, Domingos, Rute F., Markus, Arjen, Dini, Luciana, Gautam, Ravindra Kumar, Baldantoni, Daniela +5 more·2016·Water Research

Abstract

Pollution by metal and metalloid ions is one of the most widespread environmental concerns. They are non-biodegradable, and, generally, present high water solubility facilitating their environmental mobilisation interacting with abiotic and biotic components such as adsorption onto natural colloids or even accumulation by living organisms, thus, threatening human health and ecosystems. Therefore, there is a high demand for effective removal treatments of heavy metals, making the application of adsorption materials such as polymer-functionalized nanocomposites (PFNCs), increasingly attractive. PFNCs retain the inherent remarkable surface properties of nanoparticles, while the polymeric support materials provide high stability and processability. These nanoparticle-matrix materials are of great interest for metals and metalloids removal thanks to the functional groups of the polymeric matrixes that provide specific bindings to target pollutants. This review discusses PFNCs synthesis, characterization and performance in adsorption processes as well as the potential environmental risks and perspectives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.033

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basic treatment limitations are associated with directly employing free nanoparticles in water and wastewater treatment operations: nanoparticles tend to accumulate together in fluidized systems or fixed beds, which leads to a significant decrease in activities and a decrease in pressure.

    “Nanoparticles tend to accumulate together in fluidized systems or fixed beds, which leads to a significant decrease in activities and a decrease in pressure.108”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [108]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several nanocomposites that were documented had exceptional efficacy in purifying water, were capable of being reused, had a reasonable cost, and were suitable with current infrastructure.

    “Several nanocomposites that were documented had exceptional efficacy in purifying water, were capable of being reused, had a reasonable cost, and were suitable with current infrastructure.108,113”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Introduction and sections 3.8 and 4.2 describe promising metal-removal performance and nanocomposites that can be regenerated and reused; section 4.6 gives a favorable cost comparison for one material. But the paper does not establish that several nanocomposites are reasonably priced or compatible with existing infrastructure. Section 4.5 says most studies are laboratory-scale and questions their deployment in real-world settings. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lee W. C., C. H. Y. X. Lim, H. Shi, L. A. L. Tang, Y. Wang, C. T. Lim and K. P. Loh, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 7334-7341.
  2. Michler, G.H. (Ed.), Electron Microscopy of in Polymers, Springer Verlag: Heidelberg, 2008
  3. Ruiz O. N., K. A. S. Fernando, B. Wang, N. A. Brown, P. G. Luo, N. D. McNamara, M. Vangsness, Y.-P. Sun and C. E. Bunker, ACS Nano, 2011, 5, 8100-8107.
  4. Wang K., J. Ruan, H. Song, J. Zhang, Y. Wo, S. Guo and D. Cui, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2011, 6, 1- 8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lofrano, G., Carotenuto, M., Libralato, G., Domingos, R. F., Markus, A., Dini, L., Gautam, R. K., Baldantoni, D., Rossi, M., Sharma, S. K., Chattopadhyaya, M. C., Giugni, M., & Meric, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Salerno (IT)
  • Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Salento (IT)
  • University of Allahabad (IN)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • JECRC University (IN)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Libralato, Giovanni
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
92
Pages
22-37
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2264671958
Cited by
350
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 9
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
heavy metal removal, metalloid removal, adsorption, wastewater treatment, water treatment, adsorbent preparation, environmental risk, metal contamination
MeSH terms
Metals, Polymers, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Nanocomposites, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review