The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges and Opportunities for Electrochemical Processes as Next-Generation Technologies for the Treatment of Contaminated Water
Abstract
Electrochemical processes have been extensively investigated for the removal of a range of organic and inorganic contaminants. The great majority of these studies were conducted using nitrate-, perchlorate-, sulfate-, and chloride-based electrolyte solutions. In actual treatment applications, organic and inorganic constituents may have substantial effects on the performance of electrochemical treatment. In particular, the outcome of electrochemical oxidation will depend on the concentration of chloride and bromide. Formation of chlorate, perchlorate, chlorinated, and brominated organics may compromise the quality of the treated effluent. A critical review of recent research identifies future opportunities and research needed to overcome major challenges that currently limit the application of electrochemical water treatment systems for industrial and municipal water and wastewater treatment. Given the increasing interest in decentralized wastewater treatment, applications of electrolytic systems for treatment of domestic wastewater, greywater, and source-separated urine are also included. To support future adoption of electrochemical treatment, new approaches are needed to minimize the formation of toxic byproducts and the loss of efficiency caused by mass transfer limitations and undesired side reactions. Prior to realizing these improvements, recognition of the situations where these limitations pose potential health risks is a necessary step in the design and operation of electrochemical treatment systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boudreau, J., Bejan, D., Li, S., & Bunce, N. J. (2010) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie900614d · Cited by 63
Cited by
He, Y., Lin, H., Guo, Z., Zhang, W., Li, H., & Huang, W. (2019) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.11.056 · Cited by 367
Zhao, J., Li, F., Cao, Y., Zhang, X., Chen, T., Song, H., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107682 · Cited by 361
Physico-Chemical Processes for the Treatment of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A review
Nzeribe, B. N., Crimi, M., Mededovic Thagard, S., & Holsen, T. M. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1542916 · Cited by 314
Dong, G., Chen, B., Liu, B., Hounjet, L. J., Cao, Y., Stoyanov, S. R., Yang, M., & Zhang, B. (2022) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2022.118047 · Cited by 303
Electro-oxidation of organic pollutants by reactive electrochemical membranes
Trellu, C., Chaplin, B. P., Coetsier, C., Esmilaire, R., Cerneaux, S., Causserand, C., & Cretin, M. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.026 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Radjenovic, J., & Sedlak, D. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-09-25
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11292-11302
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1956694005
- Cited by
- 1,125
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.