Cited by 30Bioenergy crop production and managementBiofuel production and bioconversionBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

Managing multiple mandates: a system of systems model to analyze strategies for producing cellulosic ethanol and reducing riverine nitrate loads in the Upper Mississippi River Basin

Housh, Mashor, Yaeger, Mary A., Cai, Ximing, McIsaac, Gregory F., Khanna, Madhu, Sivapalan, Murugesu, Ouyang, Yanfeng, Al-Qadi, Imad +1 more·2015·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Implementing public policies often involves navigating an array of choices that have economic and environmental consequences that are difficult to quantify due to the complexity of multiple system interactions. Implementing the mandate for cellulosic biofuel production in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and reducing hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico by reducing riverine nitrate-N loads represent two such cases that overlap in the Mississippi River Basin. To quantify the consequences of these interactions, a system of systems (SoS) model was developed that incorporates interdependencies among the various subsystems, including biofuel refineries, transportation, agriculture, water resources and crop/ethanol markets. The model allows examination of the impact of imposing riverine nitrate-N load limits on the biofuel production system as a whole, including land use change and infrastructure needs. The synergies of crop choice (first versus second generation biofuel crops), infrastructure development, and environmental impacts (streamflow and nitrate-N load) were analyzed to determine the complementarities and trade-offs between environmental protection and biofuel development objectives. For example, the results show that meeting the cellulosic biofuel target in the RFS using Miscanthus x giganteus reduces system profits by 8% and reduces nitrate-N loads by 12% compared to the scenario without a mandate. However, greater water consumption by Miscanthus is likely to reduce streamflow with potentially adverse environmental consequences that need to be considered in future decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.5b02712

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water availability and WUE are major factors determining available land for energy cropping and reallocating or introducing crop species.

    “Water availability [91,92] and WUE [61,93,94] are major factors determining available land for energy cropping and reallocating or introducing crop species.”
  • Marginal land availability is constrained by multiple factors.

    “Marginal land availability is constrained by multiple factors, its future quantification in China should well consider not only land productivity [15,39] but also a synergy of crop species choice (conventional vs. cellulosic crops) [61,93], infrastructure viability (e.g., transportation) [93,103], and environmental availability and sustainability (e.g., water availability, soil quality) [82,105].”
  • Profit-maximizing reallocation of land to bioenergy crops while maintaining food production, and production-maximizing crop selection considering environmental constraints, could help maximize biomass production while minimizing environmental footprints.

    “Profit-maximizing reallocation land to bioenergy crops, but still maintain food production [86] from existing cropland, and production-maximizing crop selection considering en-vironmental constraints [93] could help maximize biomass production while minimize environmental footprints.”
  • Infrastructure can influence the overall landscape design and crop choice.

    “Infrastructure can influence the overall landscape design and crop choice [93,103].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Housh, M., Yaeger, M. A., Cai, X., McIsaac, G. F., Khanna, M., Sivapalan, M., Ouyang, Y., Al-Qadi, I., & Jain, A. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Cai, Ximing
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
49
Issue
19
Pages
11932-11940
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2306665237
Cited by
30
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI-083598)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
cellulosic ethanol, Renewable Fuel Standard, hypoxia, biofuel mandates, Miscanthus × giganteus, land use change, river discharge, water consumption, energy crops, Upper Mississippi River Basin, environmental policy trade-offs
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Ethanol, Cellulose, Illinois, Mississippi, Models, Theoretical, Nitrates, Rivers, Biofuels, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review