Managing multiple mandates: a system of systems model to analyze strategies for producing cellulosic ethanol and reducing riverine nitrate loads in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Abstract
Implementing public policies often involves navigating an array of choices that have economic and environmental consequences that are difficult to quantify due to the complexity of multiple system interactions. Implementing the mandate for cellulosic biofuel production in the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and reducing hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico by reducing riverine nitrate-N loads represent two such cases that overlap in the Mississippi River Basin. To quantify the consequences of these interactions, a system of systems (SoS) model was developed that incorporates interdependencies among the various subsystems, including biofuel refineries, transportation, agriculture, water resources and crop/ethanol markets. The model allows examination of the impact of imposing riverine nitrate-N load limits on the biofuel production system as a whole, including land use change and infrastructure needs. The synergies of crop choice (first versus second generation biofuel crops), infrastructure development, and environmental impacts (streamflow and nitrate-N load) were analyzed to determine the complementarities and trade-offs between environmental protection and biofuel development objectives. For example, the results show that meeting the cellulosic biofuel target in the RFS using Miscanthus x giganteus reduces system profits by 8% and reduces nitrate-N loads by 12% compared to the scenario without a mandate. However, greater water consumption by Miscanthus is likely to reduce streamflow with potentially adverse environmental consequences that need to be considered in future decision making.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Water availability and WUE are major factors determining available land for energy cropping and reallocating or introducing crop species.
“Water availability [91,92] and WUE [61,93,94] are major factors determining available land for energy cropping and reallocating or introducing crop species.”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [93]
Marginal land availability is constrained by multiple factors.
“Marginal land availability is constrained by multiple factors, its future quantification in China should well consider not only land productivity [15,39] but also a synergy of crop species choice (conventional vs. cellulosic crops) [61,93], infrastructure viability (e.g., transportation) [93,103], and environmental availability and sustainability (e.g., water availability, soil quality) [82,105].”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [93]
Profit-maximizing reallocation of land to bioenergy crops while maintaining food production, and production-maximizing crop selection considering environmental constraints, could help maximize biomass production while minimizing environmental footprints.
“Profit-maximizing reallocation land to bioenergy crops, but still maintain food production [86] from existing cropland, and production-maximizing crop selection considering en-vironmental constraints [93] could help maximize biomass production while minimize environmental footprints.”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [93]
Infrastructure can influence the overall landscape design and crop choice.
“Infrastructure can influence the overall landscape design and crop choice [93,103].”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [93]
Cites
Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus
HEATON, E. A., DOHLEMAN, F. G., & LONG, S. P. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01662.x · Cited by 886 · see citing works
Coupled Human and Natural Systems
Liu, J., Dietz, T. M., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., Elinor Ostrom, B., Pell, A. N., Lubchenco, J., et al. (2007) · AMBIO · doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[639:chans]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands
Wright, C. K., & Wimberly, M. C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215404110 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus
Rank, F., & Gregory, W. F. (2008) · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Schilling, K. E., Jha, M. K., Zhang, Y., Gassman, P. W., & Wolter, C. F. (2008) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2007wr006644 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Nitrate Loss in Subsurface Drainage as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate
Jaynes, D. B., Colvin, T. S., Karlen, D. L., Cambardella, C. A., & Meek, D. W. (2001) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2001.3041305x · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Challenges in Scaling Up Biofuels Infrastructure
Richard, T. L. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189139 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
(2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470403501 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Reduced Nitrogen Losses after Conversion of Row Crop Agriculture to Perennial Biofuel Crops
Smith, C. M., David, M. B., Mitchell, C. A., Masters, M. D., Anderson‐Teixeira, K. J., Bernacchi, C. J., & DeLucia, E. H. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2012.0210 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
System of Systems (SoS) enterprise systems engineering for information‐intensive organizations
Carlock, P. G., & Fenton, R. E. (2001) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.1021 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
McIsaac, G. F., David, M. B., & Mitchell, C. A. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0497 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of changing land use practices on nitrate export by the Mississippi River
Donner, S. D., Kucharik, C. J., & Foley, J. A. (2004) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2003gb002093 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Jain, A. K., Khanna, M., Erickson, M. J., & Huang, H. (2010) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01041.x · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationThe impacts of <i>Miscanthus</i> × <i>giganteus</i> production on the Midwest US hydrologic cycle
VANLOOCKE, A., BERNACCHI, C. J., & TWINE, T. E. (2010) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01053.x · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Le, P. V. V., Kumar, P., & Drewry, D. T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1107177108 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Ng, T. L., Eheart, J. W., Cai, X., & Miguez, F. E. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9039677 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationImpacts of biofuels production alternatives on water quantity and quality in the Iowa River Basin
Wu, Y., & Liu, S. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.030 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Simulated watershed scale impacts of corn stover removal for biofuel on hydrology and water quality
Cibin, R., Chaubey, I., & Engel, B. A. (2011) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.8280 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Kang, S., Önal, H., Ouyang, Y., Scheffran, J., & Tursun, U. D. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0369-3_10 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationSystem of Systems Model for Analysis of Biofuel Development
Housh, M., Cai, X., Ng, T. L., McIsaac, G. F., Ouyang, Y., Khanna, M., Sivapalan, M., Jain, A. K., Eckhoff, S. R., Gasteyer, S. P., et al. (2014) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000238 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimates of Biomass Yield for Perennial Bioenergy Grasses in the USA
Song, Y., Jain, A. K., Landuyt, W., Kheshgi, H. S., & Khanna, M. (2014) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-014-9546-1 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationBarney, J. N., Mann, J. J., Kyser, G. B., & DiTomaso, J. M. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.013 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Yaeger, M. A., Housh, M., Cai, X., & Sivapalan, M. (2014) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr015700 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationAnalysing a system of systems characterisation to define system of systems engineering practices
Meentemeyer, S. M., Sauser, B. J., & Boardman, J. (2009) · International Journal of System of Systems Engineering · doi:10.1504/ijsse.2009.029908 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Costs of maintaining the conservation reserve program in Illinois in the presence of biofuels
Li, L. (2012) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qin, Z., Zhuang, Q., Cai, X., He, Y., Huang, Y., Jiang, D., Lin, E., Liu, Y., Tang, Y., & Wang, M. Q. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.073 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Housh, M., Yaeger, M. A., Cai, X., McIsaac, G. F., Khanna, M., Sivapalan, M., Ouyang, Y., Al-Qadi, I., & Jain, A. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cai, Ximing
- ORCID
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-09-22
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11932-11940
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2306665237
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation (EFRI-083598)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- cellulosic ethanol, Renewable Fuel Standard, hypoxia, biofuel mandates, Miscanthus × giganteus, land use change, river discharge, water consumption, energy crops, Upper Mississippi River Basin, environmental policy trade-offs
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Ethanol, Cellulose, Illinois, Mississippi, Models, Theoretical, Nitrates, Rivers, Biofuels, Water Quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review