The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neonicotinoid Residues in Wildflowers, a Potential Route of Chronic Exposure for Bees
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, an intense debate about the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoids, a group of widely used, neurotoxic insecticides, has been joined. When these systemic compounds are applied to seeds, low concentrations are subsequently found in the nectar and pollen of the crop, which are then collected and consumed by bees. Here we demonstrate that the current focus on exposure to pesticides via the crop overlooks an important factor: throughout spring and summer, mixtures of neonicotinoids are also found in the pollen and nectar of wildflowers growing in arable field margins, at concentrations that are sometimes even higher than those found in the crop. Indeed, the large majority (97%) of neonicotinoids brought back in pollen to honey bee hives in arable landscapes was from wildflowers, not crops. Both previous and ongoing field studies have been based on the premise that exposure to neonicotinoids would occur only during the blooming period of flowering crops and that it may be diluted by bees also foraging on untreated wildflowers. Here, we show that exposure is likely to be higher and more prolonged than currently recognized because of widespread contamination of wild plants growing near treated crops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture
Landis, D. A., Wratten, S. D., & Gurr, G. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175 · Cited by 3,100
Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil
Bonmatin, J.-M., Giorio, C., Girolami, V., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D. P., Krupke, C., Liess, M., Long, E., Marzaro, M., Mitchell, E. A. D., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7 · Cited by 1,372
Self-citation
Cited by
Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems
Pretty, J. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav0294 · Cited by 655
The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
Wood, T. J., & Goulson, D. (2017) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9240-x · Cited by 623
Self-citationChronic exposure to neonicotinoids reduces honey bee health near corn crops
Tsvetkov, N., Samson-Robert, O., Sood, K., Patel, H. S., Malena, D. A., Gajiwala, P. H., Maciukiewicz, P., Fournier, V., & Zayed, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam7470 · Cited by 555
Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England
Woodcock, B. A., Isaac, N. J. B., Bullock, J. M., Roy, D. B., Garthwaite, D. G., Crowe, A., & Pywell, R. F. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12459 · Cited by 550
The decline of butterflies in Europe: Problems, significance, and possible solutions
Warren, M. S., Maes, D., van Swaay, C. A. M., Goffart, P., Van Dyck, H., Bourn, N. A. D., Wynhoff, I., Hoare, D., & Ellis, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002551117 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Botías, C., David, A., Horwood, J., Abdul-Sada, A., Nicholls, E., Hill, E., & Goulson, D.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-10-16
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 12731-12740
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W1948629506
- Cited by
- 457
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonicotinoid Residues in Wildflowers, a Potential Route of Chronic Exposure for Bees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.5b03459
- The paper
- Botías, C., David, A., Horwood, J., Abdul-Sada, A., Nicholls, E., Hill, E., & Goulson, D. (2015). Neonicotinoid Residues in Wildflowers, a Potential Route of Chronic Exposure for Bees. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.