Cited by 550Insect and Pesticide ResearchPlant and animal studiesInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England

Open access
Woodcock, Ben A., Isaac, Nicholas J. B., Bullock, James M., Roy, David B., Garthwaite, David G., Crowe, Andrew, Pywell, Richard F.·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Wild bee declines have been ascribed in part to neonicotinoid insecticides. While short-term laboratory studies on commercially bred species (principally honeybees and bumblebees) have identified sub-lethal effects, there is no strong evidence linking these insecticides to losses of the majority of wild bee species. We relate 18 years of UK national wild bee distribution data for 62 species to amounts of neonicotinoid use in oilseed rape. Using a multi-species dynamic Bayesian occupancy analysis, we find evidence of increased population extinction rates in response to neonicotinoid seed treatment use on oilseed rape. Species foraging on oilseed rape benefit from the cover of this crop, but were on average three times more negatively affected by exposure to neonicotinoids than non-crop foragers. Our results suggest that sub-lethal effects of neonicotinoids could scale up to cause losses of bee biodiversity. Restrictions on neonicotinoid use may reduce population declines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms12459

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Royle J. A. & Dorazio R. M. Hierarchical Modelling and Inference in Ecology Academic Press (2008).
  2. Plummer M. in Proceedings 26 of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing eds Hornik K., Leisch F., Zeileis A. 1– 10 (DSC 2003).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodcock, B. A., Isaac, N. J. B., Bullock, J. M., Roy, D. B., Garthwaite, D. G., Crowe, A., & Pywell, R. F.
Affiliations
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • Fera Science (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Woodcock, Ben A.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-08-16
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
12459-12459
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515577027
Cited by
550
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 6
FWCI
57.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (NE/N018125/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (N018125, NE/N018125/1, NEC04932)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
neonicotinoids, wild bees, bee decline, oilseed rape, seed treatment, extinction rates, sublethal effects, bee biodiversity, non-target effects
MeSH terms
Neonicotinoids, Algorithms, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Bees, England, Geography, Insecticides, Population Dynamics, Species Specificity, Brassica rapa, Pollination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review