The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sulfate Radical-Mediated Degradation of Sulfadiazine by CuFeO2 Rhombohedral Crystal-Catalyzed Peroxymonosulfate: Synergistic Effects and Mechanisms
Abstract
Copper-iron bimetallic oxides have shown great potential for powerful radical production by activating peroxides. In this work, CuFeO2 rhombohedral crystals (RCs) were synthesized and used as heterogeneous catalysts for peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation under various conditions. Sulfadiazine, a widely used veterinary sulfonamide, was used as a target pollutant to evaluate the efficiency of this combination. The results showed that of all the catalysts tested, the CuFeO2 RCs had the greatest reactivity. Under conditions of 0.1 g L(-1) CuFeO2 RCs and 33.0 μM PMS, the nearly complete degradation of sulfadiazine occurred within 24 min. A synergistic catalytic effect was found between solid Cu(I) and Fe(III), probably due to the accelerated reduction of Fe(III). The two activation stages that produced different radicals (hydroxyl radicals followed by sulfate radicals) existed when solid Cu(I) was used as the catalyst. The CuFeO2 RCs had a higher PMS utilization efficiency than CuFe2O4, probably because the Cu(I)-promoted reduction of solid Fe(III). A total of 10 products were identified, and their evolution was explored. On the basis of the evidence of oxidative product formation, we proposed four possible pathways of sulfadiazine degradation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xekoukoulotakis, N. P., Drosou, C., Brebou, C., Chatzisymeon, E., Hapeshi, E., Fatta-Kassinos, D., & Mantzavinos, D. (2011) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.09.027 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059 · Cited by 4,087
Ghanbari, F., & Moradi, M. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.064 · Cited by 2,680
Origins of Electron-Transfer Regime in Persulfate-Based Nonradical Oxidation Processes
Ren, W., Cheng, C., Shao, P., Luo, X., Zhang, H., Wang, S., & Duan, X. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c05374 · Cited by 1,306
Dong, X., Ren, B., Sun, Z., Li, C., Zhang, X., Kong, M., Zheng, S., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2019) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.052 · Cited by 554
Fedorov, K., Dinesh, K., Sun, X., Darvishi Cheshmeh Soltani, R., Wang, Z., Sonawane, S., & Boczkaj, G. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.134191 · Cited by 497
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, Y., Wu, D., Deng, Y., Zhang, T., & Shih, K.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-03-03
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3119-3127
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2277482974
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.