The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Remediation and Application of Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron and Its Composites for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions: A Review
Abstract
The presence of heavy metals in the industrial effluents has recently been a challenging issue for human health. Efficient removal of heavy metal ions from environment is one of the most important issues from biological and environmental point of view, and many studies have been devoted to investigate the environmental behavior of nanoscale zerovalent iron (NZVI) for the removal of toxic heavy metal ions, present both in the surface and underground wastewater. The aim of this review is to show the excellent removal capacity and environmental remediation of NZVI-based materials for various heavy metal ions. A new look on NZVI-based materials (e.g., modified or matrix-supported NZVI materials) and possible interaction mechanism (e.g., adsorption, reduction and oxidation) and the latest environmental application. The effects of various environmental conditions (e.g., pH, temperature, coexisting oxy-anions and cations) and potential problems for the removal of heavy metal ions on NZVI-based materials with the DFT theoretical calculations and EXAFS technology are discussed. Research shows that NZVI-based materials have satisfactory removal capacities for heavy metal ions and play an important role in the environmental pollution cleanup. Possible improvement of NZVI-based materials and potential areas for future applications in environment remediation are also proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: An overview
Zhang, W.-X. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025520116015 · Cited by 2,003
Shu, H.-Y., Chang, M.-C., Chen, C.-C., & Chen, P.-E. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.064 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: a comprehensive and critical review
Qasem, N. A. A., Mohammed, R. H., & Lawal, D. U. (2021) · npj Clean Water · doi:10.1038/s41545-021-00127-0 · Cited by 2,225
Yang, X., Wan, Y., Zheng, Y., He, F., Yu, Z., Huang, J., Wang, H., Ok, Y. S., Jiang, Y., & Gao, B. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.119 · Cited by 1,527
Biochar application to low fertility soils: A review of current status, and future prospects
El-Naggar, A., Lee, S. S., Rinklebe, J., Farooq, M., Song, H., Sarmah, A. K., Zimmerman, A. R., Ahmad, M., Shaheen, S. M., & Ok, Y. S. (2019) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.034 · Cited by 959
Water Purification by Using Adsorbents: A Review
Singh, N. B., Nagpal, G., Agrawal, S., & Rachna (2018) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2018.05.006 · Cited by 962
Wang, L., Shi, C., Wang, L., Pan, L., Zhang, X., & Zou, J.-J. (2020) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c9nr09274a · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Zou, Y., Wang, X., Khan, A., Wang, P., Liu, Y., Alsaedi, A., Hayat, T., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-07-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 7290-7304
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2472231696
- Cited by
- 1,369
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 62.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
