Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanistic Study of the Validity of Using Hydroxyl Radical Probes To Characterize Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes

Jing, Yin, Chaplin, Brian P.·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

The detection of hydroxyl radicals (OH • ) is typically accomplished by using reactive probe molecules, but prior studies have not thoroughly investigated the suitability of these probes for use in electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs), due to the neglect of alternative reaction mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the suitability of four OH • probes (coumarin, p -chlorobenzoic acid, terephthalic acid, and p -benzoquinone) for use in EAOPs. Experimental results indicated that both coumarin and p -chlorobenzoic acid are oxidized via direct electron transfer reactions, while p -benzoquinone and terephthalic acid are not. Coumarin oxidation to form the OH • adduct product 7-hydroxycoumarin was found at anodic potentials lower than that necessary for OH • formation. Density functional theory (DFT) simulations found a thermodynamically favorable and non-OH • mediated pathway for 7-hydroxycoumarin formation, which is activationless at anodic potentials > 2.10 V/SHE. DFT simulations also provided estimates of E ° values for a series of OH • probe compounds, which agreed with voltammetry results. Results from this study indicated that terephthalic acid is the most appropriate OH • probe compound for the characterization of electrochemical and catalytic systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.6b05513

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Jing, Y., & Chaplin, B. P.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-02-02
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
2355-2365
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2570191597
Cited by
243
References
2
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.