Cited by 116Soil Geostatistics and MappingSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsGeophysical Methods and Applications

Novel proximal sensing for monitoring soil organic C stocks and condition

Open access
Viscarra Rossel, Raphael A., Lobsey, Craig R., Sharman, Chris, Flick, Paul, McLachlan, Gordon·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Soil information is needed for environmental monitoring to address current concerns over food, water and energy securities, land degradation, and climate change. We developed the Soil Condition ANalysis System (SCANS) to help address these needs. It integrates an automated soil core sensing system (CSS) with statistical analytics and modeling to characterize soil at fine depth resolutions and across landscapes. The CSS's sensors include a γ-ray attenuation densitometer to measure bulk density, digital cameras to image the measured soil, and a visible-near-infrared (vis-NIR) spectrometer to measure iron oxides and clay mineralogy. The spectra are also modeled to estimate total soil organic carbon (C), particulate, humus, and resistant organic C (POC, HOC, and ROC, respectively), clay content, cation exchange capacity (CEC), pH, volumetric water content, available water capacity (AWC), and their uncertainties. Measurements of bulk density and organic C are combined to estimate C stocks. Kalman smoothing is used to derive complete soil property profiles with propagated uncertainties. The SCANS provides rapid, precise, quantitative, and spatially explicit information about the properties of soil profiles with a level of detail that is difficult to obtain with other approaches. The information gained effectively deepens our understanding of soil and calls attention to the central role soil plays in our environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b00889

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some novel soil quality techniques may be developed into high-throughput soil analysis to shed light on spatial and temporal variability of soil parameters and determine soil quality across different scales for application in precision agriculture, monitoring programs and life cycle assessments.

    “some of the techniques may be developed into high-throughput soil analysis to shed light on the spatial and temporal variability of soil parameters and determine soil quality across di ff erent scales for application in precision agriculture, monitoring programs and life cycle assessments (Ge et al., 2011; Viscarra Rossel et al., 2017).”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Viscarra Rossel et al., 2017

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Bouma, J. Agricultural Systems 2016, 148, 71-74.
  2. Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Adamchuk, V. I.; Sudduth, K. A.; McKenzie, N. J.; Lobsey, C. Adv. Agron. 2011, 113, 243-291.
  3. Doetterl, S.; Stevens, A.; Van Oost, K.; van Wesemael, B. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2013, 77, 1430-1435.
  4. Viscarra Rossel, R.; Cattle, S.; Ortega, A.; Fouad, Y. Geoderma 2009, 150, 253-266.
  5. Adamchuk, V. I.; Hummel, J. W.; Morgan, M. T.; Upadhyaya, S. K. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2004, 44, 71-91.
  6. de Gruijter, J.; McBratney, A.; Minasny, B.; Wheeler, I.; Malone, B.; Stockmann, U. Geoderma 2016, 265, 120-130.
  7. Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Brus, D.; Lobsey, C.; Shi, Z.; McLachlan, G. Geoderma 2016, 265, 152-163.
  8. Lobsey, C. R.; Viscarra Rossel, R. A. European Journal of Soil Science 2016, 67, 504-513.
  9. Luo, X.; Wells, L. Trans. ASAE 1992, 35, 17-26.
  10. Baldock, J. A.; Sanderman, J.; Macdonald, L. M.; Puccini, A.; Hawke, B.; Szarvas, S.; McGowan, J. Soil Research 2013, 51, 561-576.
  11. Quinlan, J. Learning with continuous classes. Proceedings AI'92, 5th Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1992; pp 343- 348.
  12. Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Webster, R. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2012, 63, 848-860.
  13. Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Hicks, W. S. European Journal of Soil Science 2015, 66, 438-450.
  14. Kennard, R. W.; Stone, L. A. Technometrics 1969, 11, 137-148.
  15. Snee, R. D. Technometrics 1977, 19, 415-428.
  16. Newman, M. C. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1993, 12, 1129-1133.
  17. Duan, N. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1983, 78, 605-610.
  18. Viscarra Rossel, R. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2007, 15, 39-47.
  19. Viscarra Rossel, R.; Minasny, B.; Roudier, P.; McBratney, A. Geoderma 2006, 133, 320-337.
  20. Clark, R. N.; Roush, T. L. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 1984, 89, 6329-6340.
  21. Roger, J.-M.; Chauchard, F.; Bellon-Maurel, V. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2003, 66, 191-204.
  22. Ji, W.; Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Shi, Z. European Journal of Soil Science 2015, 66, 555-565.
  23. Bellon-Maurel, V.; McBratney, A. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 1398-1410.
  24. Soriano-Disla, J. M.; Janik, L. J.; Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Macdonald, L. M.; McLaughlin, M. J. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2014, 49, 139-186.
  25. Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; et al. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 155, 198-230.
  26. Ben-Dor, E.; Heller, D.; Chudnovsky, A. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2008, 72, 1113-1123.
  27. Hummel, J. W.; Ahmad, I. S.; Newman, S. C.; Sudduth, K. A.; Drummond, S. T. Trans. ASAE 2004, 47, 607-618.
  28. Kweon, G.; Lund, E.; Maxton, C.; Drummond, P.; Jensen, K. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 2009, 34, 382-389.
  29. Sudduth, K. A.; Myers, D. B.; Kitchen, N. R.; Drummond, S. T. Geoderma 2013, 199, 12-21.
  30. Wetterlind, J.; Piikki, K.; Stenberg, B.; Soderstrom, M. European Journal of Soil Science 2015, 66, 631-638.
  31. Kusumo, B. H.; Hedley, M. J.; Hedley, C. B.; Tuohy, M. P. Plant Soil 2011, 338, 233-245.
  32. Li, S.; Shi, Z.; Chen, S.; Ji, W.; Zhou, L.; Yu, W.; Webster, R. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 4980-4987.
  33. Guerrero, C.; Stenberg, B.; Wetterlind, J.; Viscarra Rossel, R. A.; Maestre, F. T.; Mouazen, A. M.; Zornoza, R.; Ruiz-Sinoga, J. D.; Kuang, B. European Journal of Soil Science 2014, 65, 248-263.
  34. Ramirez-Lopez, L.; Behrens, T.; Schmidt, K.; Rossel, R. V.; Dematte, J.; Scholten, T. Geoderma 2013, 199, 43-53.
  35. Wu, Y. Z.; Chen, J.; Ji, J. F.; Tian, Q. J.; Wu, X. M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 873-878.
  36. Gebbers, R.; Adamchuk, V. I. Science 2010, 327, 828-831.
  37. Petrokofsky, G.; Kanamaru, H.; Achard, F.; Goetz, S. J.; Joosten, H.; Holmgren, P.; Lehtonen, A.; Menton, M. C.; Pullin, A. S.; Wattenbach, M. Environmental Evidence 2012, 1, 6.
  38. Jenkinson, D.; Hart, P.; Rayner, J.; Parry, L. INTECOL Bulletin 1987, 15, 1-8.
  39. Jenkinson, D. S. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 1990, 329, 361- 368.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Lobsey, C. R., Sharman, C., Flick, P., & McLachlan, G.
Affiliations
  • CSIRO Land and Water , P.O. BOX 1700, ,
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-04-17
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
5630-5641
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2606654781
Cited by
116
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (acceptedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (1194194-91)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysical Methods and Applications
Keywords
soil organic carbon, soil carbon stocks, soil condition monitoring, bulk density, visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, iron oxide, clay mineralogy, particulate organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, soil pH, available water capacity, volumetric water content, Kalman smoother, error propagation, SCAN
MeSH terms
Carbon, Environment, Environmental Monitoring, Soil, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review