Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 629

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach

Hu, Xuefei, Belle, Jessica H., Meng, Xia, Wildani, Avani, Waller, Lance A., Strickland, Matthew J., Liu, Yang·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

To estimate PM 2.5 concentrations, many parametric regression models have been developed, while nonparametric machine learning algorithms are used less often and national-scale models are rare. In this paper, we develop a random forest model incorporating aerosol optical depth (AOD) data, meteorological fields, and land use variables to estimate daily 24 h averaged ground-level PM 2.5 concentrations over the conterminous United States in 2011. Random forests are an ensemble learning method that provides predictions with high accuracy and interpretability. Our results achieve an overall cross-validation (CV) R 2 value of 0.80. Mean prediction error (MPE) and root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE) for daily predictions are 1.78 and 2.83 μg/m 3, respectively, indicating a good agreement between CV predictions and observations. The prediction accuracy of our model is similar to those reported in previous studies using neural networks or regression models on both national and regional scales. In addition, the incorporation of convolutional layers for land use terms and nearby PM 2.5 measurements increase CV R 2 by ∼0.02 and ∼0.06, respectively, indicating their significant contributions to prediction accuracy. A pair of different variable importance measures both indicate that the convolutional layer for nearby PM 2.5 measurements and AOD values are among the most-important predictor variables for the training process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b01210

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 629

Metadata

Authors
Hu, X., Belle, J. H., Meng, X., Wildani, A., Waller, L. A., Strickland, M. J., & Liu, Y.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
6936-6944
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2620300958
Cited by
629
References
4
FWCI
25.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.7b01210
The paper
Hu, X., Belle, J. H., Meng, X., Wildani, A., Waller, L. A., Strickland, M. J., & Liu, Y. (2017). Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.