The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Polyester Thin Films at the Nanoscale: Effects of Polyester Structure and Enzyme Active-Site Accessibility
Open accessAbstract
Biodegradable polyesters have a large potential to replace persistent polymers in numerous applications and to thereby reduce the accumulation of plastics in the environment. Ester hydrolysis by extracellular carboxylesterases is considered the rate-limiting step in polyester biodegradation. In this work, we systematically investigated the effects of polyester and carboxylesterase structure on the hydrolysis of nanometer-thin polyester films using a quartz-crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring. Hydrolyzability increased with increasing polyester-chain flexibility as evidenced from differences in the hydrolysis rates and extents of aliphatic polyesters varying in the length of their dicarboxylic acid unit and of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) polyesters varying in their terephthalate-to-adipate ratio by Rhizopus oryzae lipase and Fusarium solani cutinase. Nanoscale nonuniformities in the PBAT films affected enzymatic hydrolysis and were likely caused by domains with elevated terephthalate contents that impaired enzymatic hydrolysis. Yet, the cutinase completely hydrolyzed all PBAT films, including films with a terephthalate-to-adipate molar ratio of one, under environmentally relevant conditions (pH 6, 20 °C). A comparative analysis of the hydrolysis of two model polyesters by eight different carboxylesterases revealed increasing hydrolysis with increasing accessibility of the enzyme active site. Therefore, this work highlights the importance of both polyester and carboxylesterase structure to enzymatic polyester hydrolysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate)
Yoshida, S., Hiraga, K., Takehana, T., Taniguchi, I., Yamaji, H., Maeda, Y., Toyohara, K., Miyamoto, K., Kimura, Y., & Oda, K. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad6359 · Cited by 3,367
Microplastic in Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Soil?
Rillig, M. C. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302011r · Cited by 1,619
Cited by
Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Synthetic Plastics
Mohanan, N., Montazer, Z., Sharma, P. K., & Levin, D. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.580709 · Cited by 1,122
Biodegradation of synthetic polymers in soils: Tracking carbon into CO 2 and microbial biomass
Zumstein, M. T., Schintlmeister, A., Nelson, T. F., Baumgartner, R., Woebken, D., Wagner, M., Kohler, H.-P. E., McNeill, K., & Sander, M. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aas9024 · Cited by 547
Self-citationEnzyme discovery and engineering for sustainable plastic recycling
Zhu, B., Wang, D., & Wei, N. (2022) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.02.008 · Cited by 366
Sander, M. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05208 · Cited by 319
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zumstein, M. T., Rechsteiner, D., Roduner, N., Perz, V., Ribitsch, D., Guebitz, G. M., Kohler, H.-P. E., McNeill, K., & Sander, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-06-13
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7476-7485
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2619456193
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.