The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metal Organic Framework with Coordinatively Unsaturated Sites as Efficient Fenton-like Catalyst for Enhanced Degradation of Sulfamethazine
Abstract
A novel Fenton-like catalyst, metal organic framework MIL-100(Fe) with Fe II /Fe III mixed-valence coordinatively unsaturated iron center (CUS-MIL-100(Fe)), was synthesized, characterized, and used for the degradation of sulfamethazine (SMT). The catalytic performance of CUS-MIL-100(Fe) was investigated on the basis of various parameters, including initial pH, H 2 O 2 concentration, catalyst dosage, and initial SMT concentration. The results showed that CUS-MIL-100(Fe) could effectively degrade SMT, with almost 100% removal efficiency within 180 min (52.4% mineralization efficiency), under the reaction conditions of pH 4.0, 20 mg L –1 SMT, 6 mM H 2 O 2, and 0.5 g L –1 catalyst. Moreover, CUS-MIL-100(Fe) displayed a higher catalytic activity than that of MIL-100(Fe) for SMT degradation. Combined with the physical–chemical characterization, the enhanced catalytic activity can be ascribed to the incorporation of Fe II and Fe III CUSs (coordinatively unsaturated metal sites), the large specific surface area, as well as the formation of mesopores. Furthermore, CUS-MIL-100(Fe) exhibited a good stability and reusability. The possible catalytic mechanism of CUS-MIL-100(Fe) was tentatively proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059 · Cited by 4,087
Self-citationAdvanced Oxidation Processes for Wastewater Treatment: Formation of Hydroxyl Radical and Application
WANG, J. L., & XU, L. J. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2010.507698 · Cited by 1,586
Self-citationRibeiro, R. S., Frontistis, Z., Mantzavinos, D., Venieri, D., Antonopoulou, M., Konstantinou, I., Silva, A. M. T., Faria, J. L., & Gomes, H. T. (2016) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.021 · Cited by 81
Cited by
Reactive Species in Advanced Oxidation Processes: Formation, Identification and Reaction Mechanism
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126158 · Cited by 1,585
Self-citationDegradation of antibiotics by advanced oxidation processes: An overview
Wang, J., & Zhuan, R. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135023 · Cited by 1,365
Self-citationWang, J., Chu, L., Wojnárovits, L., & Takács, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140997 · Cited by 895
Self-citationHeterogeneous Fenton catalysts: A review of recent advances
Thomas, N., Dionysiou, D. D., & Pillai, S. C. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124082 · Cited by 889
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for environmental applications
Wang, J., & Zhuang, S. (2019) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213046 · Cited by 677
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, J., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-04-04
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5367-5377
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2796009291
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
