The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acid-Free and Selective Extraction of Lithium from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries via a Mechanochemically Induced Isomorphic Substitution
Abstract
Lithium (Li) is the most valuable metal in spent lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) batteries, but its recovery has become a challenge in electronic waste recovery because of its relatively low content and inconsistent quality. This study proposes an acid-free and selective Li extraction process to successfully achieve the isomorphic substitution of Li in LiFePO 4 crystals with sodium (Na). The method uses low-cost and nontoxic sodium chloride (NaCl) as a cogrinding reagent via a mechanical force-induced solid-phase reaction. X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterizations demonstrated the evidence of Li/Na isomorphic substitution, while XPS spectra of Fe 2p, P 2p, and O 1s revealed that the coordination environment of these elements was not significantly altered. Density functional theory calculations further provided evidence that Na and Li share similar outer electron arrangements and coordination environments, favoring Na over Fe as a replacement for Li in LiFePO 4 . Additionally, the regeneration of NaCl and the recovery of precipitated Li 2 CO 3 were simultaneously achieved with Na 2 CO 3 as the sole reagent. This concise and efficient acid-free mechanochemical process for Li extraction is a promising candidate for feasible recycling technology of Li from spent LiFePO 4 batteries. The proposed process is particularly appealing because of its high selectivity, considerable economic advantages, and environmental benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Cited by
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
Recycling of lithium iron phosphate batteries: Status, technologies, challenges, and prospects
Wang, M., Liu, K., Dutta, S., Alessi, D. S., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112515 · Cited by 361
Self-citationKumar, J., Neiber, R. R., Park, J., Ali Soomro, R., Greene, G. W., Ali Mazari, S., Young Seo, H., Hong Lee, J., Shon, M., Wook Chang, D., et al. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.133993 · Cited by 336
Reich, R., Slunitschek, K., Danisi, R. M., Eiche, E., & Kolb, J. (2023) · Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review · doi:10.1080/08827508.2022.2047041 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, K., Tan, Q., Liu, L., & Li, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Technology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-07-24
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9781-9788
- ISSN
- 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2962940300
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acid-Free and Selective Extraction of Lithium from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries via a Mechanochemically Induced Isomorphic Substitution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.est.9b01919
- The paper
- Liu, K., Tan, Q., Liu, L., & Li, J. (2019). Acid-Free and Selective Extraction of Lithium from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries via a Mechanochemically Induced Isomorphic Substitution. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01919
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.