Cited by 166Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Uptake of Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances at the Air–Water Interface

Schaefer, Charles E., Culina, Veronika, Nguyen, Dung, Field, Jennifer·2019·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Bench-scale experiments were performed to assess uptake of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), both single compounds and mixtures, at the air–water interface. The focus was on evaluating uptake at field-relevant PFAS concentrations (<2 × 10 –4 mol m –3 or 0.1 mg L –1 ), assessing the impacts of various PFAS mixtures, and quantifying the impacts of background NaCl concentrations. Both interfacial tension measurements and direct quantification of PFAS mass sorbed at the air–water interface in water films were used to evaluate PFAS interfacial partitioning. Results showed that a Freundlich-based model, rather than a Langmuir-based model, described perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) interfacial uptake. At lower and field-relevant PFOS and PFOA concentrations, the Langmuir-based model underpredicted interfacial uptake by up to several orders of magnitude. The interfacial partition coefficient, k aw, increased as PFAS concentrations decreased. Results also showed that the interfacial tension and interfacial uptake of PFAS mixtures were (within a factor of 2) predicted based on the single solute systems assuming ideal dilute behavior. Furthermore, the addition of NaCl at concentrations of up to 0.01 M increased PFOS uptake by less than a factor of 2 at field-relevant PFOS concentrations. The results presented herein have important implications for PFAS migration in unsaturated soils as well as for remedial technologies that rely on PFAS interfacial sorption, particularly at field-relevant PFAS concentrations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.9b04008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our estimates of Kai for PFOA (10-2.9-10-2.7 cm) and PFOS (10-2.6-10-2.1 cm) agree with values reported from laboratory studies conducted at field-relevant concentrations.

    “Our estimates of Kai for PFOA (10–2.9–10–2.7 cm) and PFOS (10–2.6–10–2.1 cm) agree with values reported from laboratory studies conducted at field-relevant concentrations (Table S18).38,39”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaefer, C. E., Culina, V., Nguyen, D., & Field, J.
Affiliations
  • CDM Smith (United States) (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, Charles E.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2019-10-02
Volume
53
Issue
21
Pages
12442-12448
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2977421026
Cited by
166
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Defense (W912HQ-18-C-0075)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, air-water interface, interfacial partitioning, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, PFAS mixtures, interfacial tension, Freundlich isotherm, Langmuir isotherm, unsaturated soil, PFAS remediation
MeSH terms
Fluorocarbons, Soil, Surface Tension, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review