Cited by 77Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnzyme-mediated dye degradationDyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers

Microalgae immobilized by nanofibrous web for removal of reactive dyes from wastewater

San Keskin, Nalan Oya, Celebioglu, Aslı, Uyar, Tamer, Tekinay, Turgay·2015·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

In this study, we have developed microalgae immobilized by polysulfone nanofibrous web (microalgae/PSU-NFW) for the removal of reactive dyes (Remazol Black 5 (RB5) and Reactive Blue 221 (RB221). Here, an electrospinning technique was used to produce polysulfone nanofibrous web (PSU-NFW) as a free-standing material on which microalgae Chlamydomona reinhardtii was immobilized on PSU-NFW. The decolorization capacities of microalgae/PSU-NFW were significantly higher than that of pristine PSU-NFW. The decolorization rate for RB5 was calculated as 72.97 ± 0.3% for microalgae/PSU-NFW, whereas it was 12.36 ± 0.3% for the pristine PSU-NFW. In the case of RB221 solution, decolorization rates were achieved as 30.2 ± 0.23 and 5.51 ± 0.4% for microalgae/PSU-NFW and pristine PSU-NFW, respectively. Reusability tests revealed that microalgae/PSU-NFW can be used in at least three successive decolorization steps in which the decolorization rate of the RB5 was found to be 51 ± 0.69% after the third reuse step. These results are promising and therefore suggest that microalgae/PSU-NFW could be applicable for the decolorization of dyes because of their versatility and reusability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01033

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biocomposite nanofiber exhibited superior decolorization capacity, achieving a 72.97% and 30.25% reduction for RB5 and RB221, respectively, versus 12.36% and 5.51%, respectively, for a pristine polysulfone nanofiber.

    “The biocomposite nanofiber exhibited superior decolorization capacity achieving a 72.97% and 30.25% reduction for RB5 and RB221, respectively, versus 12.36% and 5.51%, respectively, for a pristine polysulfone nanofiber [207].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
San Keskin, N. O., Celebioglu, A., Uyar, T., & Tekinay, T.
Affiliations
  • Polatlı Science and Literature Faculty, Biology Department, Gazi University, Ankara 06900, Turkey
  • Bilkent University (TR)
Corresponding author
  • Uyar, Tamer
  • Tekinay, Turgay
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2015-05-20
Volume
54
Issue
21
Pages
5802-5809
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2517710394
Cited by
77
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
  • Bilkent University Institutional Repository (Bilkent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (113Y348, 114Y264)
  • Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
Keywords
microalgae immobilization, reactive dyes, dye decolorization, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, electrospinning, dye wastewater treatment, adsorbent reusability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review