Cited by 74Spacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling SystemsRenewable energy and sustainable power systems

Economic Process Selection of Liquefied Natural Gas Regasification: Power Generation and Energy Storage Applications

Park, Jinwoo, Lee, Inkyu, You, Fengqi, Moon, Il·2019·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

Abstract

Liquefied natural gas (LNG) demand has been rapidly increasing due to the global need for clean energy resources. This study analyzes and compares LNG regasification processes and technologies from the technoeconomic perspective and focuses on utilizing LNG cold energy as an economically beneficial option. The comparative technoeconomic analyses focus on the following three process: (1) a simple LNG regasification process, which wastes LNG cold energy; (2) an LNG regasification power plant (LPP) process, which utilizes LNG cold energy to generate electricity; (3) an LNG regasification power plant integrated with a cryogenic energy storage (LPCES) process, which utilizes LNG cold energy to store electricity. The results indicate that the LPP process has the highest net present value of $215 million for 1 MTPA LNG regasification, whereas the simple LNG regasification process and the LPCES process are valued at $210 million and $188 million, respectively. Sensitivity analysis results show that the relative rank of profitability of these three technologies varies according to discount rates, electricity prices, and carbon tax. This study not only revealed that LNG cold energy use can be an economically beneficial option but also helped determine the most profitable LNG regasification process under varying regional and market conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yonsei University and Cornell University are active in LAES but were not reported in Table 2 because they often use the terminology 'cryogenic energy storage', which was not included in the query.

    “It is worth mentioning that Yonsei University and Cornell University are not reported in Table 2. Indeed, these institutions, active in the topic of LAES [34,35], often use the terminology”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, J., Lee, I., You, F., & Moon, I.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
  • You, Fengqi
  • Moon, Il
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
58
Issue
12
Pages
4946-4956
ISSN
  • 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5045
OpenAlex
W2921999797
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (10067793)
  • Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Keywords
liquefied natural gas regasification, LNG cold energy utilization, cryogenic energy storage, process selection, techno-economic analysis, net present value, carbon tax, electricity price sensitivity, discount rate sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review