Economic Process Selection of Liquefied Natural Gas Regasification: Power Generation and Energy Storage Applications
Abstract
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) demand has been rapidly increasing due to the global need for clean energy resources. This study analyzes and compares LNG regasification processes and technologies from the technoeconomic perspective and focuses on utilizing LNG cold energy as an economically beneficial option. The comparative technoeconomic analyses focus on the following three process: (1) a simple LNG regasification process, which wastes LNG cold energy; (2) an LNG regasification power plant (LPP) process, which utilizes LNG cold energy to generate electricity; (3) an LNG regasification power plant integrated with a cryogenic energy storage (LPCES) process, which utilizes LNG cold energy to store electricity. The results indicate that the LPP process has the highest net present value of $215 million for 1 MTPA LNG regasification, whereas the simple LNG regasification process and the LPCES process are valued at $210 million and $188 million, respectively. Sensitivity analysis results show that the relative rank of profitability of these three technologies varies according to discount rates, electricity prices, and carbon tax. This study not only revealed that LNG cold energy use can be an economically beneficial option but also helped determine the most profitable LNG regasification process under varying regional and market conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yonsei University and Cornell University are active in LAES but were not reported in Table 2 because they often use the terminology 'cryogenic energy storage', which was not included in the query.
“It is worth mentioning that Yonsei University and Cornell University are not reported in Table 2. Indeed, these institutions, active in the topic of LAES [34,35], often use the terminology”
From Recent Trends on Liquid Air Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [34]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Trends on Liquid Air Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis
Borri, E., Tafone, A., Zsembinszki, G., Comodi, G., Romagnoli, A., & Cabeza, L. F. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10082773 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Noh, W., Park, S., Kim, J., & Lee, I. (2022) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.8064 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Park, J., Lee, I., You, F., & Moon, I.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- You, Fengqi
- Moon, Il
- Venue
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-03-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4946-4956
- ISSN
- 0888-5885 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5045
- OpenAlex
- W2921999797
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (10067793)
- Ministry of Education
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Keywords
- liquefied natural gas regasification, LNG cold energy utilization, cryogenic energy storage, process selection, techno-economic analysis, net present value, carbon tax, electricity price sensitivity, discount rate sensitivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review