Cited by 5Gut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented FoodsInflammatory Bowel Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bifidobacterium bifidum Alleviate Intestinal Barrier Damage by Regulating the Intestinal Flora and Colonic Mucin O-Glycan Structural Patterns

Niu, Meng-Meng, Li, Yan, Ma, Bo, Meng, Xiang-Chen·2026·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Bifidobacterium bifidum can alleviate intestinal barrier damage, but its reliance on mucin O-glycan modifications remains unclear. A dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis mouse model was established to evaluate the therapeutic potential of B. bifidum Z29–2, C5, and their mixture. The results demonstrated that B. bifidum alleviated intestinal injury by preventing colon shortening and goblet cell depletion, as well as reducing levels of inflammatory cytokines. Furthermore, B. bifidum maintained the structural integrity of gut microbiota by enriching beneficial bacteria like Faecalibaculum and Olsenella, while suppressing the abundance of opportunistic pathogens, including Mucispirillum and Erysipelatoclostridium . Additionally, strains Z29–2 and C5 promoted goblet cell differentiation and MUC2 secretion by inhibiting of the Notch signaling pathway. Crucially, these strains enhanced mucin fucosylation by upregulating Fut1 and Fut2, while maintaining glycan homeostasis by reducing O-glycan sulfation and chain truncation. This study provides deeper protective mechanism of B. bifidum in colitis and supports its potential application as a functional supplements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jafc.5c12182

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1038/s41598-019-37908-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Niu, M.-M., Li, Y., Ma, B., & Meng, X.-C.
Affiliations
  • Northeast Agricultural University (CN)
  • Key Laboratory of Dairy Science, Ministry of Education
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2026-01-02
Volume
74
Issue
1
Pages
1575-1591
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W7117978141
Cited by
5
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Research and Development Program of Heilongjiang (JD2023SJ15)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (32272291)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
Bifidobacterium bifidum, intestinal barrier injury, colitis, mucin O-glycans, gut microbiota, goblet cells, Notch signaling, DSS-induced colitis, Faecalibaculum, Olsenella, Mucispirillum, Erysipelatoclostridium, inflammatory cytokines
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Animals, Bacteria, Colitis, Colon, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mucins, Polysaccharides, Dextran Sulfate, Probiotics, Mice, Mucin-2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review