The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
An Unambiguous Nomenclature for the Acyl-quinic Acids Commonly Known as Chlorogenic Acids
Abstract
The history of the acyl-quinic acids is briefly reviewed, the merits and limitations of the various nomenclature systems applicable are critically compared, and their limitations are highlighted, in particular their inability to provide an unambiguous description of all quinic acid enantiomers and diastereoisomers and associated acyl-quinic acids. Recommendations are made for a nomenclature system that in combination with IUPAC numbering achieves this objective. A comprehensive set of structures for the quinic acid enantiomers and diastereoisomers is presented. The Supporting Information provides an explanation of trivial names and a decision tree to determine which quinic acid isomer a structure represents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 72
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1016/S0957-4166(97)00454-0 · DOI
- 10.1002/cber.19320650623 · DOI
- 10.1002/jlac.18460600319 · DOI
- Payen, 1846, Comptes Rendus, 23, 244
- 10.1021/ja01165a095 · DOI
- 10.1042/bj1530023 · DOI
- 10.1021/ed041p116 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.196603851 · DOI
- 10.5935/0100-4042.20160063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.21311.71848 · DOI
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.23428.53126 · DOI
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.10825.95844 · DOI
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.22301.31202 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81844-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84112-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/hlca.19920750122 · DOI
- 10.1055/s-2006-959501 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)86249-4 · DOI
- 10.5560/ZNC.2012.67c0135 · DOI
- 10.3136/fstr.6.106 · DOI
- 10.1021/jf904537z · DOI
- 10.1002/pca.1299 · DOI
- Jaiswal R., 2014, Handbook of Chemical and Biological Plant Analytical Methods, 505
- 10.1039/c2ob25124h · DOI
- 10.1039/c2fo10260a · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02472 · DOI
- 10.1021/jo00831a040 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)70434-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)86209-3 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrankó, L., & Clifford, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Clifford, Michael N.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-05-02
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3602-3608
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2606172852
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- chlorogenic acid, nomenclature, diastereomers, trivial names, structure determination, decision tree
- MeSH terms
- Chlorogenic Acid, Isomerism, Terminology as Topic, Quinic Acid, Molecular Structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
