UNREMITTING PROBLEMS WITH CHLOROGENIC ACID NOMENCLATURE: A REVIEW
Open accessAbstract
This paper summarizes a problematic nomenclature of isomers belonging to chlorogenic acid family since its first occurrence until present.During decades, there have been a high number of articles dealing with the family.Unfortunately, researchers who want to get knowledge about this topic may be strongly confused after reading a few articles.Due to gradual discoveries and isolations of the individual isomers from plenty of matrices and because of the changing system of terminology after these discoveries, discrepancies among articles are common.The cause of this confusion is that the main compound of the family, 5-caffeoylquinic acid (also wellknown as chlorogenic acid), was truly called as 3-caffeoylquinic acid before 1976, when new rules for nomenclature were published.Many researchers and also chemicals suppliers, however, keep using the "pre-IUPAC" nomenclature and wrongly call 3-caffeoylquinic acid as chlorogenic acid, the main substituent of the family.Despite there have been some works struggling with this issue, the problem is still appearing.Therefore, the present work was written.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chlorogenic acid (CGA): A pharmacological review and call for further research
Naveed, M., Hejazi, V., Abbas, M., Kamboh, A. A., Khan, G. J., Shumzaid, M., Ahmad, F., Babazadeh, D., FangFang, X., Modarresi-Ghazani, F., et al. (2018) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.064 · Cited by 1,586 · see citing works
Yuan, Q., Liu, C., Zhang, Z., Chen, F., Xiao, Q., Zhang, L., Pan, X., He, F., & Xiao, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1613048 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kremr, D., Bajer, T., Bajerová, P., Surmová, S., & Ventura, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Pardubice (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Bajerová, Petra
- Venue
- Química Nova
- Publisher
- GN1 Sistemas e Publicacoes Ltd.
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 0100-4042 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2337975931
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Química Nova (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Digitální knihovna Univerzity Pardubice (Univerzity Pardubice) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
- Keywords
- chlorogenic acid, 5-caffeoylquinic acid, 3-caffeoylquinic acid, nomenclature, IUPAC rules, chemical nomenclature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
