Assessing the Lasting Impact of Co-Curricular Service Learning in Undergraduate Chemistry
Abstract
Existing research primarily examines the impact of structured, credit-bearing service learning in undergraduate chemistry, leaving the potential contributions of co-curricular service learning and its lasting influence on chemistry graduates underexplored. Therefore, this mixed-methods study aimed to assess the lasting impact of co-curricular service learning in undergraduate chemistry by conducting a longitudinal follow-up of past Kimikamahika volunteers and their peers who were not part of this community outreach. Kimikamahika stands for a magical show in chemistry wherein volunteers from a campus organization do a live demonstration of chemistry experiments to a variety of audiences in order to spark an interest in science. A total of 78 participants joined this study, with 54 in the volunteer group and 24 in the comparison group. The findings revealed that co-curricular service learning in undergraduate chemistry, such as Kimikamahika, can help students develop course-related skills, appreciate the real-world application of chemistry, recognize career opportunities, strengthen leadership skills, and deepen community engagement as they seek to address underachievement in science as a social problem. These gains from co-curricular service learning are more evident if students organize the community outreach and render a total of at least 10 h of community engagement. Such findings can inform higher education institutions and educators on how to design effective service lear…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structured reflections can ease the assessment of service-learning because the instructor will have a structured framework for evaluating students' responses.
“Also, it can ease the assessment of service-learning, as the instructor will have a structured framework for evaluating students' responses [36].”
From Beyond the Classroom: Integrating the ORID Model for In-Depth Reflection and Assessment in Service-Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [36]
Cites
Clarifying the meaning of extracurricular activity: A literature review of definitions
Bartkus, K. R., Nemelka, B., Nemelka, M., & Gardner, P. (2012) · American Journal of Business Education (AJBE) · doi:10.19030/ajbe.v5i6.7391 · Cited by 172
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kayan Fadlelmula, F., & Qadhi, S. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090987 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Indeed, for evaluating students’ responses [36].”
- Authors
- Cruz, D. J. L., Guidote, A. M., Lee Yu, H. L., & Adarlo, G. M.
- Affiliations
- Ateneo de Manila University (PH)
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0XZ
- Corresponding author
- Adarlo, Genejane M.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Education
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-05-03
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1932-1940
- ISSN
- 0021-9584 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-1328
- OpenAlex
- W4396623909
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ateneo de Manila University
- Local Government Of Marikina
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Keywords
- undergraduate chemistry education, chemistry outreach, community participation, leadership skills, science outreach, career awareness, longitudinal follow-up, chemistry demonstrations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review