Explainable Deep Relational Networks for Predicting Compound–Protein Affinities and Contacts
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Predicting compound-protein affinity is beneficial for accelerating drug discovery. Doing so without the often-unavailable structure data is gaining interest. However, recent progress in structure-free affinity prediction, made by machine learning, focuses on accuracy but leaves much to be desired for interpretability. Defining intermolecular contacts underlying affinities as a vehicle for interpretability; our large-scale interpretability assessment finds previously used attention mechanisms inadequate. We thus formulate a hierarchical multiobjective learning problem, where predicted contacts form the basis for predicted affinities. We solve the problem by embedding protein sequences (by hierarchical recurrent neural networks) and compound graphs (by graph neural networks) with joint attentions between protein residues and compound atoms. We further introduce three methodological advances to enhance interpretability: (1) structure-aware regularization of attentions using protein sequence-predicted solvent exposure and residue-residue contact maps; (2) supervision of attentions using known intermolecular contacts in training data; and (3) an intrinsically explainable architecture where atomic-level contacts or "relations" lead to molecular-level affinity prediction. The first two and all three advances result in DeepAffinity+ and DeepRelations, respectively. Our methods show generalizability in affinity prediction for molecules that are new and dissimilar to training examples. Moreover, they show superior interpretability compared to state-of-the-art interpretable methods: with similar or better affinity prediction, they boost the AUPRC of contact prediction by around 33-, 35-, 10-, and 9-fold for the default test, new-compound, new-protein, and both-new sets, respectively. We further demonstrate their potential utilities in contact-assisted docking, structure-free binding site prediction, and structure-activity relationship studies without docking. Our study represents the first model development and systematic model assessment dedicated to interpretable machine learning for structure-free compound-protein affinity prediction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Handbook of Molecular Descriptors
Todeschini, R., & Consonni, V. (2000) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527613106 · Cited by 4,107 · see citing works
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08608 · Cited by 3,121 · see citing works
Comprehensive analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity
Davis, M. I., Hunt, J. P., Herrgard, S., Ciceri, P., Wodicka, L. M., Pallares, G., Hocker, M., Treiber, D. K., & Zarrinkar, P. P. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1990 · Cited by 2,409 · see citing works
How many human proteoforms are there?
Aebersold, R., Agar, J. N., Amster, I. J., Baker, M. S., Bertozzi, C. R., Boja, E. S., Costello, C. E., Cravatt, B. F., Fenselau, C., Garcia, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2576 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Predicting Drug-Target Interactions
Torng, W., & Altman, R. B. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00628 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
The Size of the Human Proteome: The Width and Depth
Ponomarenko, E. A., Poverennaya, E. V., Ilgisonis, E. V., Pyatnitskiy, M. A., Kopylov, A. T., Zgoda, V. G., Lisitsa, A. V., & Archakov, A. I. (2016) · International Journal of Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1155/2016/7436849 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Studying Very Low Resolution Recognition Using Deep Networks
Wang, Z., Chang, S., Yang, Y., Liu, D., & Huang, T. S. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.518 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Self-citationAtomic convolutional networks for predicting protein-ligand binding affinity
Gomes, J., Ramsundar, B., Feinberg, E. N., & Pande, V. S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.10603 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fortelny, N., & Bock, C. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02100-5 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karimi, M., Wu, D., Wang, Z., & Shen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University System (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shen, Yang
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-12-21
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-66
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- PMC
- PMC7987499
- OpenAlex
- W3117081956
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R35GM124952)
- National Science Foundation (CCF-1943008)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- intermolecular contacts, explainable machine learning, attention mechanism, hierarchical recurrent neural network, graph neural networks, protein sequence embeddings, attention regularization, solvent exposure, binding site prediction, structure-activity relationship, drug discovery
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review