The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DiffDec: Structure-Aware Scaffold Decoration with an End-to-End Diffusion Model
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
In molecular optimization, one popular way is R-group decoration on molecular scaffolds, and many efforts have been made to generate R-groups based on deep generative models. However, these methods mostly use information on known binding ligands, without fully utilizing target structure information. In this study, we proposed a new method, DiffDec, to involve 3D pocket constraints by a modified diffusion technique for optimizing molecules through molecular scaffold decoration. For end-to-end generation of R-groups with different sizes, we designed a novel fake atom mechanism. DiffDec was shown to be able to generate structure-aware R-groups with realistic geometric substructures by the analysis of bond angles and dihedral angles and simultaneously generate multiple R-groups for one scaffold on different growth anchors. The growth anchors could be provided by users or automatically determined by our model. DiffDec achieved R-group recovery rates of 69.67% and 45.34% in the single and multiple R-group decoration tasks, respectively, and these values were significantly higher than competing methods (37.33% and 26.85%). According to the molecular docking study, our decorated molecules obtained a better average binding affinity than baseline methods. The docking pose analysis revealed that DiffDec could decorate scaffolds with R-groups that exhibited improved binding affinities and more favorable interactions with the pocket. These results demonstrated the potential and applicability of DiffDec in real-world scaffold decoration for molecular optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations
Song, Y., Sohl-Dickstein, J., Kingma, D. P., Kumar, A., Ermon, S., & Poole, B. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.13456 · Cited by 1,953
Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery
Macalino, S. J. Y., Gosu, V., Hong, S., & Choi, S. (2015) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5 · Cited by 762
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.1007/978-1-4939-6634-9_5 · DOI
- 10.1517/17460441003592072 · DOI
- 10.2174/1389557520666200429102334 · DOI
- 10.2174/157340911793743547 · DOI
- 10.1002/minf.201700123 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/wcms.1395 · DOI
- 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00512 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01015 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01416 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42256-022-00527-y · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00982 · DOI
- Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A. N.; Kaiser, L. u.; Polosukhin, I. Attention is All you Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 2017.
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00727 · DOI
- 10.1039/C9SC04503A · DOI
- 10.1038/s42256-021-00410-2 · DOI
- Garcia Satorras, V.; Hoogeboom, E.; Fuchs, F.; Posner, I.; Welling, M. E(n) Equivariant Normalizing Flows. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 2021; pp 4181–4192.
- 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01127.x · DOI · Paper page
- Maziarz, K.; Jackson-Flux, H.; Cameron, P.; Sirockin, F.; Schneider, N.; Stiefl, N.; Segler, M.; Brockschmidt, M. Learning to Extend Molecular Scaffolds with Structural Motifs. arXiv preprint . 2022, arXiv:2103.03864. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03864 (accessed 2024-01-22). · arXiv
- 10.1039/D0SC03126G · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00469 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci00057a005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/molecules200713384 · DOI
- Rudrapal M., 2020, Drug Repurposing
- Drenth J., 2007, Principles of protein X-ray crystallography
- 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.10.005 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.011 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-59745-177-2_19 · DOI
- Peng, X.; Luo, S.; Guan, J.; Xie, Q.; Peng, J.; Ma, J. Pocket2mol: Efficient molecular sampling based on 3d protein pockets. International Conference on Machine Learning . 2022; pp 17644–17655.
- Zhang, Z.; Min, Y.; Zheng, S.; Liu, Q.Molecule generation for target protein binding with structural motifs The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations . 2023.
- Aksan, E.; Kaufmann, M.; Cao, P.; Hilliges, O. A spatio-temporal transformer for 3d human motion prediction. 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) . 2021; pp 565–574. · DOI
- Sohl-Dickstein, J.; Weiss, E.; Maheswaranathan, N.; Ganguli, S. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. International Conference on Machine Learning . 2015; pp 2256–2265.
- Igashov, I.; Stärk, H.; Vignac, C.; Satorras, V. G.; Frossard, P.; Welling, M.; Bronstein, M.; Correia, B. Equivariant 3D-Conditional Diffusion Models for Molecular Linker Design. arXiv preprint . 2022, arXiv:2210.05274. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05274 (accessed 2024-01-22). · arXiv
- Schneuing, A.; Du, Y.; Harris, C.; Jamasb, A.; Igashov, I.; Du, W.; Blundell, T.; Lió, P.; Gomes, C.; Welling, M.; Bronstein, M.; Correia, B. Structure-based Drug Design with Equivariant Diffusion Models. arXiv preprint . 2023, arXiv:2210.13695. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13695 (accessed 2024-01-22). · arXiv
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00667 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00411 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- Luo, S.; Guan, J.; Ma, J.; Peng, J. A 3D Generative Model for Structure-Based Drug Design Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 2021; pp 6229–6239.
- Ho, J.; Jain, A.; Abbeel, P. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 2020; pp 6840–6851.
- Guan, J.; Qian, W. W.; Peng, X.; Su, Y.; Peng, J.; Ma, J. 3D Equivariant Diffusion for Target-Aware Molecule Generation and Affinity Prediction. arXiv preprint . 2023, arXiv:2303.03543. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03543 (accessed 2024-01-22). · arXiv
- Kingma, D.; Salimans, T.; Poole, B.; Ho, J. Variational Diffusion Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems . 2021; pp 21696–21707.
- Xu, M.; Yu, L.; Song, Y.; Shi, C.; Ermon, S.; Tang, J. GeoDiff: a Geometric Diffusion Model for Molecular Conformation Generation. arXiv preprint . 2022, arXiv:2203.02923. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02923 (accessed 2024-01-22). · arXiv
- Hoogeboom, E.; Satorras, V. G.; Vignac, C.; Welling, M. Equivariant diffusion for molecule generation in 3d. International Conference on Machine Learning . 2022; p 8867–8887.
- Satorras, V. G.; Hoogeboom, E.; Welling, M. E. (n) equivariant graph neural networks. International conference on machine learning . 2021; pp 9323–9332.
- 10.1186/s13321-015-0069-3 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv082 · DOI
- 10.1039/D3SC04185A · DOI
- 10.1107/S2053230X15004793 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01598 · DOI
- 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, J., Chen, S., Lei, J., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lei, Jinping
- Yang, Yuedong
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-01-24
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2554-2564
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- OpenAlex
- W4391187294
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFF1204900)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82003651)
- Guangdong-Hong Kong Technology Cooperation Funding Scheme (2023A0505010015)
- Guangzhou Basic and Applied Basic Research Project (202201011795)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds
- Keywords
- diffusion models, binding affinity, molecular docking, molecular optimization
- MeSH terms
- Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Molecular Docking Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review