Cited by 7,436Chemistry and Stereochemistry StudiesComputational Drug Discovery MethodsGraph theory and applications

SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules

Weininger, David·1988·Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTSMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rulesDavid WeiningerCite this: J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1988, 28, 1, 31–36Publication Date (Print):February 1, 1988Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 February 1988https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ci00057a005https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00057a005research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views12790Altmetric-Citations4077LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access options Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci00057a005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs) were introduced in 2015.

    “A recent development is the concept of Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs) introduced in 2015 (89).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weininger, D.
Corresponding author
Weininger, David
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
Published
1988-02-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
31-36
ISSN
  • 0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5142
OpenAlex
W1975147762
Cited by
7,436
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 748 · 2025: 1048 · 2024: 945 · 2023: 827 · 2022: 675 · 2021: 632 · 2020: 438 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 208 · 2017: 135 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 116 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 127 · 2012: 124
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Graph theory and applications
Keywords
SMILES, chemical notation, chemical information systems, chemical language, molecular representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review