Cited by 8Machine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamics

ProInterVal: Validation of Protein–Protein Interfaces through Learned Interface Representations

Open access
Ovek, Damla, Keskin, Ozlem, Gursoy, Attila·2024·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Proteins are vital components of the biological world and serve a multitude of functions. They interact with other molecules through their interfaces and participate in crucial cellular processes. Disruption of these interactions can have negative effects on organisms, highlighting the importance of studying protein-protein interfaces for developing targeted therapies for diseases. Therefore, the development of a reliable method for investigating protein-protein interactions is of paramount importance. In this work, we present an approach for validating protein-protein interfaces using learned interface representations. The approach involves using a graph-based contrastive autoencoder architecture and a transformer to learn representations of protein-protein interaction interfaces from unlabeled data and then validating them through learned representations with a graph neural network. Our method achieves an accuracy of 0.91 for the test set, outperforming existing GNN-based methods. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on a benchmark data set and show that it provides a promising solution for validating protein-protein interfaces.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01788

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ovek, D., Keskin, O., & Gursoy, A.
Affiliations
  • Koç University (TR)
  • Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
  • Computer Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2024-03-25
Volume
64
Issue
8
Pages
2979-2987
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4393150627
Cited by
8
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Koç Üniversitesi
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interfaces, protein-protein interaction, graph neural networks, transformer models, unlabeled data
MeSH terms
Learning, Models, Molecular, Electric Power Supplies, Protein Binding, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Benchmarking, Protein Interaction Mapping, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review