Cited by 705Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions

Janin, Joël, Henrick, Kim, Moult, John, Eyck, Lynn Ten, Sternberg, Michael J. E., Vajda, Sandor, Vakser, Ilya, Wodak, Shoshana J.·2003·Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics

Abstract

CAPRI is a communitywide experiment to assess the capacity of protein‐docking methods to predict protein–protein interactions. Nineteen groups participated in rounds 1 and 2 of CAPRI and submitted blind structure predictions for seven protein–protein complexes based on the known structure of the component proteins. The predictions were compared to the unpublished X‐ray structures of the complexes. We describe here the motivations for launching CAPRI, the rules that we applied to select targets and run the experiment, and some conclusions that can already be drawn. The results stress the need for new scoring functions and for methods handling the conformation changes that were observed in some of the target systems. CAPRI has already been a powerful drive for the community of computational biologists who development docking algorithms. We hope that this issue of Proteins will also be of interest to the community of structural biologists, which we call upon to provide new targets for future rounds of CAPRI, and to all molecular biologists who view protein–protein recognition as an essential process. Proteins 2003;52:2–9. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/prot.10381

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., Eyck, L. T., Sternberg, M. J. E., Vajda, S., Vakser, I., & Wodak, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Janin, Joël
Venue
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-13
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
2-9
ISSN
  • 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0134
OpenAlex
W2137167381
Cited by
703
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 32
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
Capri, protein-protein docking, protein-protein interaction, protein-protein complex, scoring functions, conformational change, X-ray structure comparison
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Forecasting, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Crystallography, X-Ray, Genomics, Protein Interaction Mapping, Macromolecular Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review