Cited by 12Block Copolymer Self-AssemblyAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationMachine Learning in Materials Science

The Block Copolymer Phase Behavior Database

Open access
Rebello, Nathan J., Arora, Akash, Mochigase, Hidenobu, Lin, Tzyy-Shyang, Shi, Jiale, Audus, Debra J., Muckley, Eric S., Osmani, Ardiana +1 more·2024·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

The Block Copolymer Database (BCDB) is a platform that allows users to search, submit, visualize, benchmark, and download experimental phase measurements and their associated characterization information for di- and multiblock copolymers. To the best of our knowledge, there is no widely accepted data model for publishing experimental and simulation data on block copolymer self-assembly. This proposed data schema with traceable information can accommodate any number of blocks and at the time of publication contains over 5400 block copolymer total melt phase measurements mined from the literature and manually curated and simulation data points of the phase diagram generated from self-consistent field theory that can rapidly be augmented. This database can be accessed via the Community Resource for Innovation in Polymer Technology (CRIPT) web application and the Materials Data Facility. The chemical structure of the polymer is encoded in BigSMILES, an extension of the Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) into the macromolecular domain, and the user can search repeat units and functional groups using the SMARTS search syntax (SMILES Arbitrary Target Specification). The user can also query characterization and phase information using Structured Query Language (SQL) and download custom sets of block copolymer data to train machine learning models. Finally, a protocol is presented in which GPT-4, an AI-powered large language model, can be used to rapidly screen and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00242

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rebello, N. J., Arora, A., Mochigase, H., Lin, T.-S., Shi, J., Audus, D. J., Muckley, E. S., Osmani, A., & Olsen, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Citrine Informatics (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Olsen, Bradley D.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2024-08-10
Volume
64
Issue
16
Pages
6464-6476
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4401481890
Cited by
12
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2040636)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
block copolymers, phase behavior, self-assembly, phase diagram, data schema, SMARTS, self-consistent field theory, machine learning training data, literature screening, GPT-4
MeSH terms
Polymers, Phase Transition, Databases, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review