Cited by 47Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Structure-Based Drug Design with a Deep Hierarchical Generative Model

Open access
Weller, Jesse A., Rohs, Remo·2024·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Rapid advancement in the computational methods of structure-based drug design has led to their widespread adoption as key tools in the early drug development process. Recently, the remarkable growth of available crystal structure data and libraries of commercially available or readily synthesizable molecules have unlocked previously inaccessible regions of chemical space for drug development. Paired with improvements in virtual ligand screening methods, these expanded libraries are having a significant impact on the success of early drug design efforts. However, screening-based methods are limited in their scalability due to computational limits and the sheer scale of drug-like space. An approach within the quickly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI), deep generative modeling, is extending the reach of molecular design beyond classical methods by learning the fundamental intra- and inter-molecular relationships in drug-target systems from existing data. In this work we introduce DrugHIVE, a deep hierarchical structure-based generative model that enables fine-grained control over molecular generation. Our model outperforms state of the art autoregressive and diffusion-based methods on common benchmarks and in speed of generation. Here, we demonstrate DrugHIVEs capacity to accelerate a wide range of common drug design tasks such as de novo generation, molecular optimization, scaffold hopping, linker design, and high throughput pattern replacement. Our method is highly scalable and can be applied to high confidence AlphaFold predicted receptors, extending our ability to generate high quality drug-like molecules to a majority of the unsolved human proteome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01193

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Weller, J. A., & Rohs, R.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Rohs, Remo
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2024-07-26
Volume
64
Issue
16
Pages
6450-6463
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4401021414
Cited by
47
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0021/2018)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM130376)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
structure-based drug design, generative models, hierarchical variational autoencoder, virtual screening, de novo molecular generation, molecular optimization, scaffold hopping, linker design, AlphaFold protein structure, chemical space exploration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review