Structure-Based Drug Design with a Deep Hierarchical Generative Model
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Rapid advancement in the computational methods of structure-based drug design has led to their widespread adoption as key tools in the early drug development process. Recently, the remarkable growth of available crystal structure data and libraries of commercially available or readily synthesizable molecules have unlocked previously inaccessible regions of chemical space for drug development. Paired with improvements in virtual ligand screening methods, these expanded libraries are having a significant impact on the success of early drug design efforts. However, screening-based methods are limited in their scalability due to computational limits and the sheer scale of drug-like space. An approach within the quickly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI), deep generative modeling, is extending the reach of molecular design beyond classical methods by learning the fundamental intra- and inter-molecular relationships in drug-target systems from existing data. In this work we introduce DrugHIVE, a deep hierarchical structure-based generative model that enables fine-grained control over molecular generation. Our model outperforms state of the art autoregressive and diffusion-based methods on common benchmarks and in speed of generation. Here, we demonstrate DrugHIVEs capacity to accelerate a wide range of common drug design tasks such as de novo generation, molecular optimization, scaffold hopping, linker design, and high throughput pattern replacement. Our method is highly scalable and can be applied to high confidence AlphaFold predicted receptors, extending our ability to generate high quality drug-like molecules to a majority of the unsolved human proteome.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Varadi, M., Anyango, S., Deshpande, M., Nair, S., Natassia, C., Yordanova, G., Yuan, D., Stroe, O., Wood, G., Laydon, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · Cited by 7,850 · see citing works
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · see citing works
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.09.519842 · Cited by 2,369 · see citing works
De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion
Watson, J. L., Juergens, D., Bennett, N. R., Trippe, B. L., Yim, J., Eisenach, H. E., Ahern, W., Borst, A. J., Ragotte, R. J., Milles, L. F., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · Cited by 2,325 · see citing works
Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it?
Sun, D., Gao, W., Hu, H., & Zhou, S. (2022) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.02.002 · Cited by 1,763 · see citing works
Deep learning enables rapid identification of potent DDR1 kinase inhibitors
Zhavoronkov, A., Ivanenkov, Y. A., Aliper, A., Veselov, M. S., Aladinskiy, V. A., Aladinskaya, A. V., Terentiev, V. A., Polykovskiy, D. A., Kuznetsov, M. D., Asadulaev, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0224-x · Cited by 1,573 · see citing works
Synthon-based ligand discovery in virtual libraries of over 11 billion compounds
Sadybekov, A. A., Sadybekov, A. V., Liu, Y., Iliopoulos-Tsoutsouvas, C., Huang, X.-P., Pickett, J., Houser, B., Patel, N., Tran, N. K., Tong, F., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04220-9 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases)
Hu, L., Benson, M. L., Smith, R. D., Lerner, M. G., & Carlson, H. A. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20512 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
The structural coverage of the human proteome before and after AlphaFold
Porta-Pardo, E., Ruiz-Serra, V., Valentini, S., & Valencia, A. (2022) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009818 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Weller, J. A., & Rohs, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rohs, Remo
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2024-07-26
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6450-6463
- ISSN
- 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-960X
- PMC
- PMC11350878
- OpenAlex
- W4401021414
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0021/2018)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM130376)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Keywords
- structure-based drug design, generative models, hierarchical variational autoencoder, virtual screening, de novo molecular generation, molecular optimization, scaffold hopping, linker design, AlphaFold protein structure, chemical space exploration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review