Cited by 18Protein Degradation and InhibitorsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Construction of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Structure Distribution Profiles Using Extensive Conformational Search

Open access
Kudo, Genki, Hirao, Takumi, Harada, Ryuhei, Shigeta, Yasuteru, Hirokawa, Takatsugu, Yoshino, Ryunosuke·2025·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are heterobifunctional small molecules that recruit E3 ubiquitin ligases to a target protein and induce its ubiquitination by forming a ternary complex. However, the structural dynamics underlying the complex formation and degradation efficiency remain unclear. In this study, we attempted an extensive conformational search using the parallel cascade selection molecular dynamics (PaCS-MD) and outlier flooding (OFLOOD) method for PROTACs differing in linker length. Markov state models revealed that while all PROTACs share a common low free-energy state, their structural distribution profiles differ significantly. These results suggest that linker-dependent conformational distribution profiles modulate degradation activity and cooperativity, offering mechanistic insights into rational PROTAC design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00102

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kudo, G., Hirao, T., Harada, R., Shigeta, Y., Hirokawa, T., & Yoshino, R.
Affiliations
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Corresponding author
Yoshino, Ryunosuke
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-06-23
Volume
65
Issue
13
Pages
6939-6948
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4411545881
Cited by
18
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 4
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JPMXP1020230120)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP24ama121029j0003)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP23H02427, JP23H04879, JP23K16987, JP23K18033)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
PROTACs, ternary complex, E3 ubiquitin ligase, protein degradation, linker length, conformational search, Markov state models, PROTAC design
MeSH terms
Markov Chains, Protein Conformation, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Small Molecule Libraries, Ubiquitination, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review