Cited by 13Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advancements in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening through the Synergistic Integration of Graph Neural Networks and Expert-Crafted Descriptors

Open access
Liu, Yunchao, Moretti, Rocco, Wang, Yu, Dong, Ha, Yan, Bailu, Bodenheimer, Bobby, Derr, Tyler, Meiler, Jens·2025·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The fusion of traditional chemical descriptors with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) offers a compelling strategy for enhancing ligand-based virtual screening methodologies. A comprehensive evaluation revealed that the benefits derived from this integrative strategy vary significantly among different GNNs. Specifically, while GCN and SchNet demonstrate pronounced improvements by incorporating descriptors, SphereNet exhibits only marginal enhancement. Intriguingly, despite SphereNet's modest gain, all three models-GCN, SchNet, and SphereNet-achieve comparable performance levels when leveraging this combination strategy. This observation underscores a pivotal insight: sophisticated GNN architectures may be substituted with simpler counterparts without sacrificing efficacy, provided that they are augmented with descriptors. Furthermore, our analysis reveals a set of expert-crafted descriptors' robustness in scaffold-split scenarios, frequently outperforming the combined GNN-descriptor models. Given the critical importance of scaffold splitting in accurately mimicking real-world drug discovery contexts, this finding accentuates an imperative for GNN researchers to innovate models that can adeptly navigate and predict within such frameworks. Our work not only validates the potential of integrating descriptors with GNNs in advancing ligand-based virtual screening but also illuminates pathways for future enhancements in model development and application. Our implementation can be found at https://github.com/meilerlab/gnn-descriptor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00822

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1124/pr.112.007336 · DOI
  2. Baek, M.; Anishchenko, I.; Humphreys, I.; Cong, Q.; Baker, D.; DiMaio, F.Efficient and accurate prediction of protein structure using RoseTTAFold bioRxiv 2023; Vol. 2 10.1101/2023.05.24.542179. · DOI
  3. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.drudis.2011.02.011 · DOI
  6. Klicpera, J.; Groß, J.; Günnemann, S.Directional Message Passing for Molecular Graphs. 2020, arXiv:2003.03123. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03123. · arXiv
  7. Zhang, Y.An In-depth Summary of Recent Artificial Intelligence Applications in Drug Design. 2021, arXiv:2110.05478. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05478. · arXiv
  8. Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Liu, H.; Ji, S.ComENet: Towards Complete and Efficient Message Passing for 3D Molecular Graphs. 2022, arXiv:2206.08515. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.08515. · arXiv
  9. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Vu, O. T.; Moretti, R.; Bodenheimer, B.; Meiler, J.; Derr, T.Interpretable Chirality-Aware Graph Neural Network for Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship Modeling in Drug Discovery bioRxiv 2022 10.1101/2022.08.24.505155. · DOI
  10. 10.1063/1.5019779 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Klicpera, J.; Giri, S.; Margraf, J. T.; Günnemann, S.Fast and Uncertainty-Aware Directional Message Passing for Non-Equilibrium Molecules. 2020, arXiv:2011.14115. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.14115. · arXiv
  12. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.; Oztekin, B.; Ji, S.Spherical message passing for 3d graph networks. 2021, arXiv:2102.05013. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05013. · arXiv
  13. 10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5747 · DOI
  14. Alon, U.; Yahav, E. On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and Its Practical Implications 2020, arXiv:2006.05205. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05205. · arXiv
  15. Zhong, Z.; Barkova, A.; Mottin, D. Knowledge-Augmented Graph Machine Learning for Drug Discovery: A Survey from Precision to Interpretability. 2023, arXiv:2302.08261. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08261. · DOI
  16. 10.1093/bib/bbab112 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s10822-016-9895-2 · DOI
  18. Kipf, T. N.; Welling, M.Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. 2016, arXiv:1609.02907. arXiv.org e-Printarchive. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02907. · arXiv
  19. 10.3389/fphar.2022.833099 · DOI
  20. Hsu H., 2014, Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials
  21. 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.10.009 · DOI
  22. 10.21767/2470-6973.100022 · DOI
  23. 10.3390/molecules18010735 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gky1033 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0898-5529(90)90156-3 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/ci100214a · DOI
  28. 10.1021/jm000375v · DOI
  29. 10.1021/jm030644s · DOI
  30. Järvelin, K.; Kekäläinen, J. In IR Evaluation Methods for Retrieving Highly Relevant Documents , Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval; Association for Computing Machinery: Athens, Greece, 2000; pp 41–48. · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s10822-019-00199-8 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Y., Moretti, R., Wang, Y., Dong, H., Yan, B., Bodenheimer, B., Derr, T., & Meiler, J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Amherst College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Derr, Tyler
  • Meiler, Jens
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-05-14
Volume
65
Issue
10
Pages
4898-4905
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4410370730
Cited by
13
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL122010)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1423 - 421152132, SPP2363)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA046138)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM080403)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
ligand-based virtual screening, graph neural networks, descriptor fusion, GCN, SchNet, molecular property prediction, drug discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review