Cited by 93Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

WESTPA 2.0: High-Performance Upgrades for Weighted Ensemble Simulations and Analysis of Longer-Timescale Applications

Open access
Russo, John D., Zhang, She, Leung, Jeremy M. G., Bogetti, Anthony T., Thompson, Jeff P., DeGrave, Alex J., Torrillo, Paul A., Pratt, A. J. +8 more·2022·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The weighted ensemble (WE) family of methods is one of several statistical mechanics-based path sampling strategies that can provide estimates of key observables (rate constants and pathways) using a fraction of the time required by direct simulation methods such as molecular dynamics or discrete-state stochastic algorithms. WE methods oversee numerous parallel trajectories using intermittent overhead operations at fixed time intervals, enabling facile interoperability with any dynamics engine. Here, we report on the major upgrades to the WESTPA software package, an open-source, high-performance framework that implements both basic and recently developed WE methods. These upgrades offer substantial improvements over traditional WE methods. The key features of the new WESTPA 2.0 software enhance the efficiency and ease of use: an adaptive binning scheme for more efficient surmounting of large free energy barriers, streamlined handling of large simulation data sets, exponentially improved analysis of kinetics, and developer-friendly tools for creating new WE methods, including a Python API and resampler module for implementing both binned and "binless" WE strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01154

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russo, J. D., Zhang, S., Leung, J. M. G., Bogetti, A. T., Thompson, J. P., DeGrave, A. J., Torrillo, P. A., Pratt, A. J., Wong, K. F., Xia, J., Copperman, J., Adelman, J. L., Zwier, M. C., LeBard, D. N., Zuckerman, D. M., & Chong, L. T.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • OpenEye Scientific, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Drake University (US)
Corresponding author
Chong, Lillian T.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2022-01-19
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
638-649
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4226013321
Cited by
93
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CHE-1807301)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R01 GM115805)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
path sampling, rate constants, reaction pathways, activation barrier, adaptive binning, Python interface, resampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review