The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated Covalent Drug Design Workflow Using Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Covalent drug design is an important component in drug discovery. Traditional drugs interact with their target in a reversible equilibrium, while irreversible covalent drugs increase the drug-target interaction duration by forming a covalent bond with targeted residues and thus may offer a more effective therapeutic approach. To facilitate the design of this class of ligands, computational methods can be used to help identify reactive nucleophilic residues, frequently cysteines, on a target protein for covalent binding, to test various warhead groups for their potential reactivities, and to predict noncovalent contributions to binding that can facilitate drug-target interactions that are important for binding specificity. To further aid covalent drug design, we extended a functional group mapping approach based on explicit solvent all-atom molecular simulations (SILCS: site identification by ligand competitive saturation) that intrinsically considers protein flexibility, functional group, and protein desolvation along with functional group-protein interactions. Through docking of a library of representative warhead fragments using SILCS-Monte Carlo (SILCS-MC), reactive cysteines can be correctly identified for proteins being tested. Furthermore, a machine learning model was trained to quantify the effectiveness of various warhead groups for proteins using metrics from SILCS-MC as well as experimental model compound warhead reactivity data. The ability to rank covalent molecular binders with similar warheads using SILCS ligand grid free energy (LGFE) ranking was also tested for several proteins. Based on these tools, an integrated SILCS-based workflow was developed, named SILCS-Covalent, which can both qualitatively and quantitatively inform covalent drug discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19
Hammond, J., Leister-Tebbe, H., Gardner, A., Abreu, P., Bao, W., Wisemandle, W., Baniecki, M., Hendrick, V. M., Damle, B., Simón-Campos, A., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2118542 · Cited by 2,323
The resurgence of covalent drugs
Singh, J., Petter, R. C., Baillie, T. A., & Whitty, A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3410 · Cited by 1,873
The target landscape of clinical kinase drugs
Klaeger, S., Heinzlmeir, S., Wilhelm, M., Polzer, H., Vick, B., Koenig, P.-A., Reinecke, M., Ruprecht, B., Petzoldt, S., Meng, C., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan4368 · Cited by 854
Advances in covalent drug discovery
Boike, L., Henning, N. J., & Nomura, D. K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00542-z · Cited by 823
Covalent inhibitors: a rational approach to drug discovery
Sutanto, F., Konstantinidou, M., & Dömling, A. (2020) · RSC Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d0md00154f · Cited by 389
Theory and Applications of Covalent Docking in Drug Discovery: Merits and Pitfalls
Kumalo, H., Bhakat, S., & Soliman, M. (2015) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules20021984 · Cited by 158
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- Yu W., 2017, Antibiotics. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1520, 85
- Yu W., 2023, Antibiotics, 2601, 123, 10.1007/978-1-0716-2855-3_7 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrd1034 · DOI
- 10.4155/fmc-2020-0236 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201601091 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/nejmoa1509388 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11030-022-10523-4 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci500118s · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.1666 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/jm0306430 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ci100214a · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02007 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00228 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.r111.275578 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct100578z · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00631 · DOI
- 10.1039/d1md00277e · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000435 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct500201y · DOI
- 10.1021/ci100462t · DOI
- 10.1021/ci4005628 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10822-014-9728-0 · DOI
- 10.1021/ci500691p · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25650 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129519 · DOI
- 10.1039/d1nj04028f · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00210 · DOI
- 10.1039/d1sc01781k · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112836 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab868 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11885.x · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.24660 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/jp973084f · DOI
- 10.1021/ct300400x · DOI
- 10.1021/j100059a038 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90421-5 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.447334 · DOI
- 10.1103/physreva.31.1695 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
- Vanommeslaeghe K., 2010, J. Comput. Chem., 31, 671, 10.1002/jcc.21367 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.23067 · DOI
- 10.1093/imamat/6.3.222 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.26064 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01216 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.09.033 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm0003440 · DOI
- Pedregosa F., 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825
- 10.1038/s41467-019-12996-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/mc.23047 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.02.021 · DOI
- 10.1107/s0907444912051062 · DOI
- 10.1126/science1108367 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.925 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-06787-w · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.7b04880 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0707 · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.8b11027 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja2066972 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms13084 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-17861-6 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.252756299 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112740 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.27121 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01153 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, W., Weber, D. J., & MacKerell, A. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Wenbo
- MacKerell, Alexander D.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-04-28
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3007-3021
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-9626
- PMC
- PMC10205696
- OpenAlex
- W4367308762
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (GM131710)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- covalent drug design, reactive cysteines, SILCS, protein flexibility, ligand-based drug design
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Ligands, Proteins, Drug Design, Workflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review