Cited by 16Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated Covalent Drug Design Workflow Using Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation

Open access
Yu, Wenbo, Weber, David J., MacKerell, Alexander D.·2023·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Covalent drug design is an important component in drug discovery. Traditional drugs interact with their target in a reversible equilibrium, while irreversible covalent drugs increase the drug-target interaction duration by forming a covalent bond with targeted residues and thus may offer a more effective therapeutic approach. To facilitate the design of this class of ligands, computational methods can be used to help identify reactive nucleophilic residues, frequently cysteines, on a target protein for covalent binding, to test various warhead groups for their potential reactivities, and to predict noncovalent contributions to binding that can facilitate drug-target interactions that are important for binding specificity. To further aid covalent drug design, we extended a functional group mapping approach based on explicit solvent all-atom molecular simulations (SILCS: site identification by ligand competitive saturation) that intrinsically considers protein flexibility, functional group, and protein desolvation along with functional group-protein interactions. Through docking of a library of representative warhead fragments using SILCS-Monte Carlo (SILCS-MC), reactive cysteines can be correctly identified for proteins being tested. Furthermore, a machine learning model was trained to quantify the effectiveness of various warhead groups for proteins using metrics from SILCS-MC as well as experimental model compound warhead reactivity data. The ability to rank covalent molecular binders with similar warheads using SILCS ligand grid free energy (LGFE) ranking was also tested for several proteins. Based on these tools, an integrated SILCS-based workflow was developed, named SILCS-Covalent, which can both qualitatively and quantitatively inform covalent drug discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00232

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Yu W., 2017, Antibiotics. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1520, 85
  2. Yu W., 2023, Antibiotics, 2601, 123, 10.1007/978-1-0716-2855-3_7 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nrd1034 · DOI
  4. 10.4155/fmc-2020-0236 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/anie.201601091 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1056/nejmoa1509388 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11030-022-10523-4 · DOI
  8. 10.1021/ci500118s · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nchembio.1666 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1021/jm0306430 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1021/ci100214a · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02007 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00228 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.r111.275578 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/ct100578z · DOI
  16. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00631 · DOI
  17. 10.1039/d1md00277e · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000435 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/ct500201y · DOI
  20. 10.1021/ci100462t · DOI
  21. 10.1021/ci4005628 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s10822-014-9728-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/ci500691p · DOI
  24. 10.1002/prot.25650 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129519 · DOI
  26. 10.1039/d1nj04028f · DOI
  27. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00210 · DOI
  28. 10.1039/d1sc01781k · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112836 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/nar/gkab868 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11885.x · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/jcc.24660 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1021/jp973084f · DOI
  36. 10.1021/ct300400x · DOI
  37. 10.1021/j100059a038 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90421-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
  41. 10.1063/1.447334 · DOI
  42. 10.1103/physreva.31.1695 · DOI
  43. 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
  44. Vanommeslaeghe K., 2010, J. Comput. Chem., 31, 671, 10.1002/jcc.21367 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/jcc.23067 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/imamat/6.3.222 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/jcc.26064 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01216 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.09.033 · DOI
  50. 10.1021/jm0003440 · DOI
  51. Pedregosa F., 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825
  52. 10.1038/s41467-019-12996-8 · DOI
  53. 10.1002/mc.23047 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.02.021 · DOI
  55. 10.1107/s0907444912051062 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science1108367 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/nchembio.925 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/s41467-018-06787-w · DOI
  59. 10.1021/jacs.7b04880 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2016.10.008 · DOI
  61. 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0707 · DOI
  62. 10.1021/jacs.8b11027 · DOI
  63. 10.1021/ja2066972 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/ncomms13084 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/s41598-017-17861-6 · DOI
  66. 10.1073/pnas.252756299 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112740 · DOI
  68. 10.1002/jcc.27121 · DOI
  69. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01153 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Yu, W., Weber, D. J., & MacKerell, A. D.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yu, Wenbo
  • MacKerell, Alexander D.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2023-04-28
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
3007-3021
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4367308762
Cited by
16
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (GM131710)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
covalent drug design, reactive cysteines, SILCS, protein flexibility, ligand-based drug design
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Ligands, Proteins, Drug Design, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review