Cited by 5Protein Structure and DynamicsProtein purification and stabilityPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational Procedure for Predicting Excipient Effects on Protein–Protein Affinities

Open access
Dignon, Gregory L., Dill, Ken A.·2024·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions lie at the center of many biological processes and are a challenge in formulating biological drugs, such as antibodies. A key to mitigating protein association is to use small-molecule additives, i.e., excipients that can weaken protein-protein interactions. Here, we develop a computationally efficient model for predicting the viscosity-reducing effect of different excipient molecules by combining atomic-resolution MD simulations, binding polynomials, and a thermodynamic perturbation theory. In a proof of principle, this method successfully ranks the order of four types of excipients known to reduce the viscosity of solutions of a particular monoclonal antibody. This approach appears useful for predicting the effects of excipients on protein association and phase separation, as well as the effects of buffers on protein solutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01197

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1038/s41580-018-0078-y · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.286.5438.287 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nphys3532 · DOI
  4. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-071819-113553 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nrm.2017.7 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.041 · DOI
  8. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045115 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/jps.20079 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-0-387-76643-0_9 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.bpc.2015.07.002 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/19420862.2015.1128606 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b00621 · DOI
  14. 10.1023/A:1012193326789 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118505 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/19420862.2019.1599634 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.106 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11458 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01511 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1817564116 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c10489 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00545 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00775 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/bip.20608 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/19420862.2016.1222342 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.06.005 · DOI
  27. 10.4161/mabs.28394 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/jcc.20820 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/prot.24403 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/prot.25219 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.str.2020.06.006 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255 · DOI
  35. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/ct5010406 · DOI
  38. Flory P. J., 1953, Principles of Polymer Chemistry
  39. 10.1021/bi00839a053 · DOI
  40. Wyman J., 1990, Binding and Linkage: Functional Chemistry of Biological Macromolecules
  41. Dill K., 2010, Molecular Driving Forces: Statistical Thermodynamics in Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Nanoscience, 10.4324/9780203809075 · DOI
  42. Dill K., 2017, Protein Actions: Principles and Modeling, 10.1201/9781315212210 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Dignon, G. L., & Dill, K. A.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
Dill, Ken A.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2024-01-31
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
1479-1488
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W4391404684
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (3RM1GM13513604S1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, pharmaceutical excipients, viscosity reduction, monoclonal antibodies, thermodynamic perturbation theory, molecular dynamics simulation, protein association, phase separation, buffering effect, biopharmaceutical formulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review