Cited by 320Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesCrystallography and molecular interactionsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

The Nonlocal Kernel in van der Waals Density Functionals as an Additive Correction: An Extensive Analysis with Special Emphasis on the B97M-V and ωB97M-V Approaches

Najibi, Asim, Goerigk, Lars·2018·Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Abstract

The development of van der Waals density functional approximations (vdW-DFAs) has gained considerable interest over the past decade. While in a strictest sense, energy calculations with vdW-DFAs should be carried out fully self-consistently, we demonstrate conclusively for a total of 11 methods that such a strategy only increases the computational time effort without having any significant effect on energetic properties, electron densities, or orbital-energy differences. The strategy to apply a nonlocal vdW-DFA kernel as an additive correction to a fully converged conventional DFA result is therefore justified and more efficient. As part of our study, we utilize the extensive GMTKN55 database for general main-group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions [ Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 32184], which allows us to analyze the very promising B97M-V [ J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 074111] and ωB97M-V [ J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 214110] DFAs. We also present new DFT-D3(BJ) based counterparts of these two methods and of ωB97X-V [ J. Chem. Theory Comput 2013, 9, 263], which are faster variants with similar accuracy. Our study concludes with updated recommendations for the general method user, based on our current overview of 325 dispersion-corrected and -uncorrected DFA variants analyzed for GMTKN55. vdW-DFAs are the best representatives of the three highest rungs of Jacob's Ladder, namely, B97M-V, ωB97M-V, and DSD-PBEP86-NL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ωB97X-D3(BJ) functional shows considerably better performance for water cluster binding energies and reaction barriers than the baseline SCAN+D3(BJ) functional.

    “For the higher-level reference, we chose the range-separated hybrid DFT functional ωB97X complemented with the empirical dispersion correction D3(BJ): a functional that shows considerably better performance for water cluster binding energies and reaction barriers74,77,78 than our baseline reference SCAN+D3(BJ) functional.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Najibi, A., & Goerigk, L.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Goerigk, Lars
Venue
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2018-10-09
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
5725-5738
ISSN
  • 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-9626
OpenAlex
W2897973547
Cited by
320
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Education and Training
  • University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Crystallography and molecular interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
van der Waals density functional, nonlocal kernel, additive correction, dispersion-corrected functionals, Jacob's ladder, non-covalent interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review