Cited by 34Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Design and structural optimization of dual FXR/PPARδ activators

Schierle, Simone, Neumann, Sebastian, Heitel, Pascal, Willems, Sabine, Kaiser, Astrid, Pollinger, Julius, Merk, Daniel·2020·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is considered as severe hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome and has alarming global prevalence. The ligand-activated transcription factors farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) δ have been validated as molecular targets to counter NASH. To achieve robust therapeutic efficacy in this multifactorial pathology, combined peripheral PPARδ-mediated activity and hepatic effects of FXR activation appear as a promising multitarget approach. We have designed a minimal dual FXR/PPARδ activator scaffold by rational fusion of pharmacophores derived from selective agonists. Our dual agonist lead compound exhibited weak agonism on FXR and PPARδ and was structurally refined to a potent and balanced FXR/PPARδ activator in a computer-aided fashion. The resulting dual FXR/PPARδ modulator comprises high selectivity over related nuclear receptors and activates the two target transcription factors in native cellular settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00618

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual FXR/PPARδ agonists are currently developed for treatment of NASH.

    “Interestingly, in extension of dual PPARα/γ and α/δ agonists, dual FXR/PPARδ agonists are currently developed for treatment of NASH.235”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schierle, S., Neumann, S., Heitel, P., Willems, S., Kaiser, A., Pollinger, J., & Merk, D.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Merk, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2020-07-20
Volume
63
Issue
15
Pages
8369-8379
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W3043067184
Cited by
34
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Aventis Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
farnesoid X receptor, PPARδ, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, nuclear receptor agonists, multi-target drug design, structure-activity optimization, computer-aided drug design, metabolic syndrome
MeSH terms
Receptor, Farnesoid X-Activated, Humans, Ligands, Structure-Activity Relationship, Drug Design, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, PPAR delta, Drug Discovery, Molecular Docking Simulation, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review