Cited by 815Computational Drug Discovery MethodsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyMedical and Pharmaceutic Studies

U.S. FDA Approved Drugs from 2015–June 2020: A Perspective

Bhutani, Priyadeep, Joshi, Gaurav, Raja, Nivethitha, Bachhav, Namrata, Rajanna, Prabhakar K., Bhutani, Hemant, Paul, Atish T., Kumar, Raj·2021·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

In the present work, we report compilation and analysis of 245 drugs, including small and macromolecules approved by the U.S. FDA from 2015 until June 2020. Nearly 29% of the drugs were approved for the treatment of various types of cancers. Other major therapeutic areas of focus were infectious diseases (14%); neurological conditions (12%); and genetic, metabolic, and cardiovascular disorders (7-8% each). Itemization of the approved drugs according to the year of approval, sponsor, target, chemical class, major drug-metabolizing enzyme(s), route of administration/elimination, and drug-drug interaction liability (perpetrator or/and victim) is presented and discussed. An effort has been made to analyze the pharmacophores to identify the structural (e.g., aromatic, heterocycle, and aliphatic), elemental (e.g., boron, sulfur, fluorine, phosphorus, and deuterium), and functional group (e.g., nitro drugs) diversity among the approved drugs. Further, descriptor-based chemical space analysis of FDA approved drugs and several strategies utilized for optimizing metabolism leading to their discoveries have been emphasized. Finally, an analysis of drug-likeness for the approved drugs is presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01786

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhutani, P., Joshi, G., Raja, N., Bachhav, N., Rajanna, P. K., Bhutani, H., Paul, A. T., & Kumar, R.
Affiliations
  • Syngene International (India) (IN)
  • Central University of Punjab (IN)
  • 1015 E Cozza Drive # 12, Spokane Washington 99208, United States
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (India) (IN)
  • Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Paul, Atish T.
  • Kumar, Raj
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2021-02-22
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
2339-2381
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W3132520955
Cited by
815
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 144 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 140 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 43
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (EMR/2017/002702)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Syngene International Limited
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Medical and Pharmaceutic Studies
Keywords
FDA-approved drugs, drug approval trends, anticancer agents, infectious disease drugs, neurological drugs, drug metabolism, drug-drug interactions, pharmacophore analysis, chemical space analysis, drug-likeness, drug discovery strategies
MeSH terms
Humans, Organic Chemicals, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review