Cited by 39Protein Degradation and InhibitorsEstrogen and related hormone effectsAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Discovery of a Novel Class of PROTACs as Potent and Selective Estrogen Receptor α Degraders to Overcome Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo

Xie, Baohua, Yin, Zhinang, Hu, Zhiye, Lv, Junhui, Du, Chuanqian, Deng, Xiangping, Huang, Yuan, Li, Qiuzi +4 more·2023·Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a well-established target for endocrine therapies of ER-positive breast cancer (ER + BC), but endocrine resistance limits the efficacy of clinical drugs. Using proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) technology to degrade ERα may be an effective alternative to endocrine therapies. Herein, we disclose a novel series of potent and selective ERα PROTACs based on an oxabicycloheptane sulfonamide (OBHSA) scaffold, with no associated ERβ degradation. These PROTACs showed significant antiproliferation and ERα degradation activities against a broad spectrum of ER + BC cells including tamoxifen-resistant and ERα mutant cell lines. Genomics analysis confirmed that these PROTACs inhibited the nascent RNA synthesis of ERα target genes and impaired genome-wide ERα binding. Compound ZD12 exhibited excellent antitumor potency and ERα degradation activity in both tamoxifen-sensitive and -resistant BC mice models, which are superior to fulvestrant. This study demonstrates the potential of these PROTACs as novel drug candidates for endocrine-resistant BC treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c02032

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, B., Yin, Z., Hu, Z., Lv, J., Du, C., Deng, X., Huang, Y., Li, Q., Huang, J., Liang, K., Zhou, H.-B., & Dong, C.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Jian
  • Liang, Kaiwei
  • Zhou, Hai-Bing
  • Dong, Chune
Venue
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Published
2023-05-10
Volume
66
Issue
10
Pages
6631-6651
ISSN
  • 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4804
OpenAlex
W4376108966
Cited by
39
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2020YFA0908800)
  • Central University Basic Research Fund of China (2042021kf1033)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773557, 82073690, 82173676, 82273774)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
PROTACs, estrogen receptor alpha, endocrine therapy resistance, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, tamoxifen resistance, fulvestrant
MeSH terms
Proteolysis Targeting Chimera, Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Estrogen Antagonists, Female, Humans, Receptors, Estrogen, Tamoxifen, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Cell Proliferation, Mice, MCF-7 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review