Cited by 24Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistryChemical Reactions and Mechanisms

Triplet-State Structures, Energies, and Antiaromaticity of BN Analogues of Benzene and Their Benzo-Fused Derivatives

Baranac-Stojanović, Marija·2019·The Journal of Organic Chemistry

Abstract

It is well known that benzene is aromatic in the ground state (the Hückel’s rule) and antiaromatic in the first triplet (T 1 ) excited state (the Baird’s rule). Whereas its BN analogues, the three isomeric dihydro-azaborines, have been shown to have various degrees of aromaticity in their ground state, almost no data are available for their T 1 states. Thus, the purpose of this work is to theoretically [B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)] predict structures, energies, and antiaromaticity of T 1 dihydro-azaborines and some benzo-fused derivatives. Conclusions are based on spin density analysis, isogyric and hydrogenation reactions, HOMA, NICS, and ACID calculations. The results suggest that singlet–triplet energy gaps, antiaromaticity, and related excited-state properties of benzene, naphthalene, and anthracene could be tuned and controlled by the BN substitution pattern. While all studied compounds remain (nearly) planar upon excitation, the spin density distribution in T 1 1,4-dihydro-azaborine induces a conformational change by which the two co-planar C–H bonds in the ground state become perpendicular to each other in the excited state. This predicted change in geometry could be of interest for the design of new photomechanical materials. Excitation of B–CN/N–NH 2 1,4-azaborine would have a few effects: intramolecular charge transfer, aromaticity reversal, rotation, and stereoelectronic Umpolung of the amino group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.joc.9b01858

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Later theoretical studies supported Baird's rule for both carbocycles and heterocycles.

    “Later theoretical studies supported the proposal, now known as Baird's rule, for both carbocycles and heterocycles.”

    From Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them (2025) · cites this paper as [188]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baranac-Stojanović, M.
Affiliations
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 12-16, P.O.Box 158, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Venue
The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
84
Issue
21
Pages
13582-13594
ISSN
  • 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6904
OpenAlex
W2973671453
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Organic Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cherry (Univesrity of Belgrade, Faculty of Chemistry) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnolo?kog Razvoja (172020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms
Keywords
triplet state, antiaromaticity, Baird's rule, Hückel aromaticity, singlet-triplet energy gap, spin density distribution, conformational change, intramolecular charge transfer, umpolung, NICS, acids, HOMA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review