Cited by 30Chemical Reaction MechanismsSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

Reaction Mechanism for Direct Proton Transfer from Carbonic Acid to a Strong Base in Aqueous Solution I: Acid and Base Coordinate and Charge Dynamics

Open access
Daschakraborty, Snehasis, Kiefer, Philip M., Miller, Yifat, Motro, Yair, Pines, Dina, Pines, Ehud, Hynes, James T.·2016·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Protonation by carbonic acid H2CO3 of the strong base methylamine CH3NH2 in a neutral contact pair in aqueous solution is followed via Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics simulations. Proton transfer (PT) occurs to form an aqueous solvent-stabilized contact ion pair within 100 fs, a fast time scale associated with the compression of the acid-base hydrogen-bond (H-bond), a key reaction coordinate. This rapid barrierless PT is consistent with the carbonic acid-protonated base pKa difference that considerably favors the PT, and supports the view of intact carbonic acid as potentially important proton donor in assorted biological and environmental contexts. The charge redistribution within the H-bonded complex during PT supports a Mulliken picture of charge transfer from the nitrogen base to carbonic acid without altering the transferring hydrogen's charge from approximately midway between that of a hydrogen atom and that of a proton.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12742

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dissolution of CO2 from the atmosphere increases carbonate concentration in water.

    “The dissolution of CO2 from the atmosphere also increases the carbonate concentration in the water matrix [37].”

    From Advanced Oxidation Processes for Degradation of Water Pollutants—Ambivalent Impact of Carbonate Species: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses aqueous CO2, carbonic acid and bicarbonate, but does not say that atmospheric CO2 dissolution increases carbonate concentration. Searches for atmospheric CO2 dissolution and carbonate concentration found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [5]Thibodeau GA Patton KT Anatomy and Physiology 5th Mosby Elsevier St. Louis, MO 2003
  2. [33]Pines D Pines E Solvent Assisted Photoacidity Hydrogen-Transfer Reactions Hynes JT Klinman JP Limbach HH Schowen RL Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Weinheim, Germany 2007 1 377 415
  3. [35]Serjeant EP Dempsey B Ionization Constants of Organic Acids in Aqueous Solution Pergamon Oxford 1979
  4. [52]Galib M Hanna G Mechanistic Insights into the Dissociation Decomposition of Carbonic Acid in Water via the Hydroxide Route: An Ab Initio Metadynamics Study J Phys Chem B 2011 115 15024 15035 22053746
  5. [74]Hynes JT Klinman JP Limbach HH Schowen RL Hydrogen-Transfer Reactions Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Weinheim, Germany 2007
  6. [81]Mulliken RS Person WB Molecular Complexes Wiley New York 1969

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daschakraborty, S., Kiefer, P. M., Miller, Y., Motro, Y., Pines, D., Pines, E., & Hynes, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Daschakraborty, Snehasis
  • Kiefer, Philip M.
  • Pines, Ehud
  • Hynes, James T.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2016-03-02
Volume
120
Issue
9
Pages
2271-2280
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2280605182
Cited by
30
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (PO 1000125420)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
carbonic acid, proton transfer, methylamine, contact ion pairs, hydrogen bonding, reaction mechanism, charge redistribution, Mulliken population analysis, pKa difference, aqueous solutions, proton donors
MeSH terms
Carbonic Acid, Protons, Solutions, Water, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review