Cited by 35Magnetism in coordination complexesMachine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Surfing Multiple Conformation-Property Landscapes via Machine Learning: Designing Single-Ion Magnetic Anisotropy

Open access
Lunghi, Alessandro, Sanvito, Stefano·2020·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Computational statistical disciplines, such as machine learning, are leading to a paradigm shift in the way we conceive the design of new compounds, offering a way to directly design the best compound for specific applications. This approach, known as reverse engineering, requires the construction of models able to efficiently predict continuous structure–property maps. Here, we show that machine learning offers such a possibility by designing a model that predicts both the energy and magnetic properties as a function of the molecular structure of a single-ion magnet. This model is then used to explore the molecular conformational landscapes in search of structures that maximize magnetic anisotropy. We find that a 5% change in one of the coordination angles leads to a ∼50% increase in the anisotropy. This approach can be applied to any structure–property relation and paves the way for a machine-learning-driven optimization of chemical compounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01187

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low-cost, topological, three-dimensional, one-hot chemical encoding, and geometric descriptors are often employed for this purpose in transition-metal chemistry.

    “Low-cost, topological (5, 7, 32, 92-94), three-dimensional (95-100), one-hot chemical encoding (92, 101), and geometric (e.g., for MOF pores) (102-104) descriptors are often employed for this purpose in transition-metal chemistry.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lunghi, A., & Sanvito, S.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Lunghi, Alessandro
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2020-02-13
Volume
124
Issue
10
Pages
5802-5806
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W3006100765
Cited by
35
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (14/IA/2624)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Magnetism in coordination complexes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
single-ion magnets, magnetic anisotropy, conformational landscape, structure-property relationships, machine learning, reverse engineering, molecular energy prediction, compound design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review