Cited by 27Zeolite Catalysis and SynthesisCatalysts for Methane ReformingCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions

Influence of Acidity on the Methanol-to-DME Reaction in Zeotypes: A First Principles-Based Microkinetic Study

Arvidsson, Adam A., Plessow, Philipp N., Studt, Felix, Hellman, Anders·2020·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Acidity is considered a key factor in zeotype-based catalysts. Here, the effect of acidity in the methanol-to-DME reaction is investigated using first-principles calculations and microkinetic modeling, thereby establishing a connection between acididity and kinetics. The CHA, MFI, and BEA frameworks are investigated, and the acidity of the Brønsted hydroxyl group is varied by exchanging a T-site Si with Al, B, Ga, and Fe in the zeolites, along with SAPO-34, Mg-AlPO-34, Zn-AlPO-34, and Ti-AlPO-34 zeotypes with the CHA structure, and as a result, the Brønsted hydroxyl group spans a wide range of acidity. Clear trends in adsorption and transition-state energies are found and by means of linear regression, we obtain scaling relations of relevant energies that are later used as input in a mean-field steady-state microkinetic model. This study confirms that both the shift in frequency of the Brønsted hydroxyl stretch, Δ f OH, caused by adsorption of CO and the ammonia adsorption energy, Δ E ammonia, on the Brønsted site are equivalent descriptors for the acidity of the Brønsted acid site and the reactivity of the different zeotypes relevant for the methanol-to-DME reaction. It further shows that a full microkinetic model is needed to accurately describe the reaction over the whole range of temperatures. However, if focusing on low temperatures, where the associative mechanism is dominating the reaction, a simple rate-determining step model is actually able to describe the results with satisfying agreement (deviation of the rate by less than a factor of two).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03125

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arvidsson, A. A., Plessow, P. N., Studt, F., & Hellman, A.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Arvidsson, Adam A.
  • Hellman, Anders
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
124
Issue
27
Pages
14658-14663
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W3035179284
Cited by
27
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsr??det
  • R??ntgen-??ngstr??m Cluster
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Helmholtz Association
  • Baden-W??rttemberg (RV bw17D011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Keywords
zeolite acidity, Brønsted acid sites, microkinetic modeling, first-principles calculations, CHA framework, MFI framework, SAPO-34, CO adsorption, scaling laws, rate-determining step, associative mechanism, reaction kinetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review