The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Machine Learning Model on Simple Features for CO2 Reduction Electrocatalysts
Abstract
Electroreduction of CO 2 is one of the most potential ways to realize CO 2 recycle and energy regeneration. The key to promoting this technology is the development of high-performance electrocatalysts. Generally, high-throughput computational screening contributes a lot to materials innovation, but still consumes much time and resource. To achieve efficient exploration of electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction, we created a machine learning model based on an extreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR) algorithm and simple features. Our screening model successfully and rapidly predicted the Gibbs free energy change of CO adsorption (Δ G CO ) of 1060 atomically dispersed metal–nonmetal codoped graphene systems, and greatly reduced the research cost. The competitive reaction, the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), is also discussed with respect to such a screening model. This work demonstrates the potential of machine learning methods and provides a convenient approach for the effective theoretical design of electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
Activity Descriptors for CO 2 Electroreduction to Methane on Transition-Metal Catalysts
Peterson, A. A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz201461p · Cited by 1,667
Kibria, M. G., Edwards, J. P., Gabardo, C. M., Dinh, C., Seifitokaldani, A., Sinton, D., & Sargent, E. H. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201807166 · Cited by 1,331
Tran, K., & Ulissi, Z. W. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0142-1 · Cited by 920
Back, S., Lim, J., Kim, N.-Y., Kim, Y.-H., & Jung, Y. (2017) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c6sc03911a · Cited by 542
Mechanistic Insights for Low-Overpotential Electroreduction of CO2 to CO on Copper Nanowires
Cao, L., Raciti, D., Li, C., Livi, K. J. T., Rottmann, P. F., Hemker, K. J., Mueller, T., & Wang, C. (2017) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b03107 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Chang, B., Pang, H., Raziq, F., Wang, S., Huang, K.-W., Ye, J., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee00964e · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, A., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Yao, S., & Zhou, Z.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-09-16
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 22471-22478
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W3091030757
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Machine Learning Model on Simple Features for CO2 Reduction Electrocatalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05964
- The paper
- Chen, A., Zhang, X., Chen, L., Yao, S., & Zhou, Z. (2020). A Machine Learning Model on Simple Features for CO2 Reduction Electrocatalysts. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05964
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.