The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating Li Microstructure Formation on Li Anodes for Lithium Batteries by in Situ 6Li/7Li NMR and SEM
Open accessAbstract
The growth of lithium microstructures during battery cycling has, to date, prohibited the use of Li metal anodes and raises serious safety concerns even in conventional lithium-ion rechargeable batteries, particularly if they are charged at high rates. The electrochemical conditions under which these Li microstructures grow have, therefore, been investigated by in situ nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and susceptibility calculations. Lithium metal symmetric bag cells containing LiPF 6 in EC/DMC electrolytes were used. Distinct 7 Li NMR resonances were observed due to the Li metal bulk electrodes and microstructures, the changes in peak positions and intensities being monitored in situ during Li deposition. The changes in the NMR spectra, observed as a function of separator thickness and porosity (using Celgard and Whatmann glass microfiber membranes) and different applied pressures, were correlated with changes in the type of microstructure, by using SEM. Isotopically enriched 6 Li metal electrodes were used against natural abundance predominantly 7 Li metal counter electrodes to investigate radiofrequency (rf) field penetration into the Li anode and to confirm the assignment of the higher frequency peak to Li dendrites. The conclusions were supported by calculations performed to explore the effect of the different microstructures on peak position/broadening, the study showing that Li NMR spectroscopy can be used as a sensitive probe of both the amount and type of microstructure formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electron paramagnetic resonance imaging for real-time monitoring of Li-ion batteries
Sathiya, M., Leriche, J.-B., Salager, E., Gourier, D., Tarascon, J.-M., & Vezin, H. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7276 · Cited by 312
Orsini, F., Du Pasquier, A., Beaudoin, B., Tarascon, J. M., Trentin, M., Langenhuizen, N., De Beer, E., & Notten, P. (1998) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(98)00128-1 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Li plating as unwanted side reaction in commercial Li-ion cells – A review
Waldmann, T., Hogg, B.-I., & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.063 · Cited by 895
Lithium Metal Anodes with Nonaqueous Electrolytes
Zhang, J.-G., Xu, W., Xiao, J., Cao, X., & Liu, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00275 · Cited by 730
Lithium Plating Mechanism, Detection, and Mitigation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lin, X., Khosravinia, K., Hu, X., Li, J., & Lu, W. (2021) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100953 · Cited by 490
Understanding undesirable anode lithium plating issues in lithium-ion batteries
Liu, Q., Du, C., Shen, B., Zuo, P., Cheng, X., Ma, Y., Yin, G., & Gao, Y. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra19482f · Cited by 473
Wang, X., Zhang, M., Alvarado, J., Wang, S., Sina, M., Lu, B., Bouwer, J., Xu, W., Xiao, J., Zhang, J.-G., et al. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03606 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, H. J., Trease, N. M., Ilott, A. J., Zeng, D., Du, L.-S., Jerschow, A., & Grey, C. P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-07-07
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 16443-16451
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2211673977
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.