The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin of High Photocatalytic Efficiency in Monolayer g-C3N4/CdS Heterostructure: A Hybrid DFT Study
Abstract
Graphite-like carbon nitride (g-C 3 N 4 )-based heterostructures have attracted much attention because of their prominent photocatalytic performance. However, theoretical understanding on the relationship of the interface and enhanced photocatalytic activity is still lacking. In this study, we systematically calculated energy band structure and charge transfer of the g-C 3 N 4 /CdS heterojunction using the hybrid density functional approach. The interaction between g-C 3 N 4 and the CdS (110) surface was explored. Results indicated that g-C 3 N 4 and CdS were in contact and formed a van der Waals heterojunction. The valence and conduction band edge positions of g-C 3 N 4 and CdS changed with the Fermi level and formed a standard type-II heterostructure. Furthermore, density of states, Bader charge, and charge density difference indicated that the internal electric field facilitated the separation of electron–hole pair in the g-C 3 N 4 /CdS interface and restrained carrier recombination. These results demonstrated that the band structure of the g-C 3 N 4 /CdS heterojunction had significant advantages to improve photocatalytic efficiency under visible-light irradiation. Moreover, our work may be used as a basis for the design of other highly active heterostructures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway
Liu, J., Liu, Y., Liu, N., Han, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, H., Lifshitz, Y., Lee, S.-T., Zhong, J., & Kang, Z. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa3145 · Cited by 4,468
Self-citationGe, L., Han, C., Xiao, X., & Guo, L. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.006 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Cocatalysts for Selective Photoreduction of CO2into Solar Fuels
Li, X., Yu, J., Jaroniec, M., & Chen, X. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00400 · Cited by 2,304
2D/2D Heterojunction of Ultrathin MXene/Bi2WO6 Nanosheets for Improved Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Cao, S., Shen, B., Tong, T., Fu, J., & Yu, J. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201800136 · Cited by 1,543
First-principle calculation study of tri-s-triazine-based g-C3N4: A review
Zhu, B., Zhang, L., Cheng, B., & Yu, J. (2018) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.025 · Cited by 502
Kovačič, Ž., Likozar, B., & Huš, M. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c02557 · Cited by 474
Powerful combination of MOFs and C3N4 for enhanced photocatalytic performance
Wang, C.-C., Yi, X.-H., & Wang, P. (2019) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.091 · Cited by 419
Huang, D., Yan, X., Yan, M., Zeng, G., Zhou, C., Wan, J., Cheng, M., & Xue, W. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b03620 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-12-11
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 28417-28423
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2281092351
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.