Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dissection of Electronic Substituent Effects in Multielectron–Multistep Molecular Catalysis. Electrochemical CO2-to-CO Conversion Catalyzed by Iron Porphyrins

Azcarate, Iban, Costentin, Cyrille, Robert, Marc, Savéant, Jean-Michel·2016·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Redox pairs of transition metal complexes are often involved in small molecule activation in response to modern energy challenges as well as in other areas of electrocatalysis. Within such a family of molecular electrocatalysts, ligand substitution is a means of varying catalytic efficiency, best gauged through catalytic Tafel plots relating overpotential and turnover frequency. In practice, efficient molecular catalysis involves multielectron–multistep processes. It is in this framework that we discuss through-structure inductive substituent effects. What the best choice is for the reference thermodynamic index, how the global substituent effect may be expressed as a function of this index, and how it may be dissected into individual effects assigned to each of the reaction steps are challenging questions that are addressed and resolved here for the first time. The discussion is illustrated by the effect of successive phenyl perfluoration and of o, o ′-methoxy substitution of the Fe I/0 tetraphenylporphyrin catalysts of the CO 2 -to-CO electrochemical conversion. Consequences on the relative position of the catalytic Tafel plots are also examined. This analysis of through-structure electronic effects is a necessary preliminary to the investigation of substituent through-space effects (electrostatic, H-bonding) because, albeit of different nature, they may occur simultaneously. Investigation of these two aspects of substituent effects and of the rules that emerge thereof pave the way to future imaginative design of catalysts for the CO 2 -to-CO-conversion and also for any other molecular catalytic reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09947

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Azcarate, I., Costentin, C., Robert, M., & Savéant, J.-M.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2016-12-07
Volume
120
Issue
51
Pages
28951-28960
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2557210740
Cited by
189
References
4
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissection of Electronic Substituent Effects in Multielectron–Multistep Molecular Catalysis. Electrochemical CO2-to-CO Conversion Catalyzed by Iron Porphyrins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09947
The paper
Azcarate, I., Costentin, C., Robert, M., & Savéant, J.-M. (2016). Dissection of Electronic Substituent Effects in Multielectron–Multistep Molecular Catalysis. Electrochemical CO2-to-CO Conversion Catalyzed by Iron Porphyrins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.