Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Copper Cluster Size Effect in Methanol Synthesis from CO2

Open access
Yang, Bing, Liu, Cong, Halder, Avik, Tyo, Eric C., Martinson, Alex B. F., Seifert, Sönke, Zapol, Peter, Curtiss, Larry A., Vajda, Stefan·2017·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Size-selected Cu n catalysts ( n = 3, 4, 20) were synthesized on Al 2 O 3 thin films using mass-selected cluster deposition. A systematic study of size and support effects was carried out for CO 2 hydrogenation at atmospheric pressure using a combination of in situ grazing incidence X-ray absorption spectroscopy, catalytic activity measurement, and first-principles calculations. The catalytic activity for methanol synthesis is found to strongly vary as a function of the cluster size; the Cu 4 /Al 2 O 3 catalyst shows the highest turnover rate for CH 3 OH production. With only one atom less than Cu 4, Cu 3 showed less than 50% activity. Density functional theory calculations predict that the activities of the gas-phase Cu clusters increase as the cluster size decreases; however, the stronger charge transfer interaction with Al 2 O 3 support for Cu 3 than for Cu 4 leads to remarkably reduced binding strength between the adsorbed intermediates and supported Cu 3, which subsequently results in a less favorable energetic pathway to transform carbon dioxide to methanol.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01835

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Yang, B., Liu, C., Halder, A., Tyo, E. C., Martinson, A. B. F., Seifert, S., Zapol, P., Curtiss, L. A., & Vajda, S.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2017-05-08
Volume
121
Issue
19
Pages
10406-10412
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2612982170
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.