Cited by 44Zeolite Catalysis and SynthesisCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

The Effect of Aluminum Short-Range Ordering on Carbon Dioxide Adsorption in Zeolites

Findley, John M., Ravikovitch, Peter I., Sholl, David S.·2018·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

The distribution of Al in cationic zeolites is important in controlling the performance of these materials, but it is challenging to measure this distribution experimentally. We examine the effect of Al ordering in a range of industrially relevant zeolites on CO 2 adsorption using molecular simulations based on high quality force fields. A Reverse Monte Carlo method is used to generate Al distributions with specified degrees of order or randomness. Results for a range of Na + -exchanged zeolites show that CO 2 adsorption isotherms can be used to distinguish between different degrees of Al ordering. Good agreement with experiments is observed in the limited number of cases where information is available independently about Al ordering. The differences that exist among adsorption isotherms as a function of Al ordering can be understood in terms of the existence of single- and dual-cation sites as quantified by Na–Na radial distribution functions. Our results show that measurements of CO 2 adsorption combined with molecular simulations can be used to determine Al ordering in zeolites without relying on the more challenging experimental techniques previously available for this task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03475

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When aluminum is evenly distributed throughout the framework, the adsorption capacity of aluminosilicate zeolites is enhanced.

    “For instance, when the aluminum is evenly distributed throughout the framework, the adsorption capacity of aluminosilicate zeolites is enhanced and the adsorption heat remains constant.”
  • The charge density, size, and concentration of the SDA play an important role in controlling Al distribution.

    “The charge density, size, and concentration of the SDA play an important role in this sense.”
  • When aluminum is evenly distributed throughout the framework, the adsorption heat of aluminosilicate zeolites remains constant.

    “For instance, when the aluminum is evenly distributed throughout the framework, the adsorption capacity of aluminosilicate zeolites is enhanced and the adsorption heat remains constant.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Findley, J. M., Ravikovitch, P. I., & Sholl, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • ExxonMobil (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Sholl, David S.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2018-05-18
Volume
122
Issue
23
Pages
12332-12340
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2804802437
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
Funders
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
CO2 adsorption, zeolites, sodium-exchanged zeolite, reverse Monte Carlo, adsorption isotherms, aluminum distribution, molecular simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review