The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium Diffusion Mechanism through Solid–Electrolyte Interphase in Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
Abstract
The composition, structure, and the formation mechanism of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) in lithium-based (e.g., Li-ion and Li metal) batteries have been widely explored in the literature. However, very little is known about the ion transport through the SEI. Understanding the underlying ion diffusion processes across the SEI could lead to a significant progress, enabling the performance increase and improving safety aspects of batteries. Herein, we report the results of first-principles density functional theory calculations on the dominant diffusion pathways, energetics, and the corresponding diffusion coefficients associated with Li diffusion through the polycrystalline SEI. This paper is particularly concerned with the Li diffusion through the grain boundary (GB) formed between the three major inorganic components of the SEI, such as Li 2 O, LiF, and Li 2 CO 3 . It is found that Li diffusion occurs through the numerous open channels formed by the GB. The energetics and potential barriers vary significantly depending upon the structure of these channels, with the general trend being that Li diffusion in the GB is generally faster than in the neighboring crystalline regions within the grain interiors. In addition, the elastic properties of the GB are calculated allowing for more profound understanding of the SEI stability and formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Advanced Model for Solid Electrolyte Interphase Electrodes in Liquid and Polymer Electrolytes
Peled, E., Golodnitsky, D., & Ardel, G. (1997) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1837858 · Cited by 1,205
Cited by
A Growing Appreciation for the Role of LiF in the Solid Electrolyte Interphase
Tan, J., Matz, J., Dong, P., Shen, J., & Ye, M. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202100046 · Cited by 1,019
Interface engineering toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries
Guo, Y., Niu, Q., Pei, F., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Du, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Fan, L., et al. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee04183b · Cited by 322
Insights into the deposition chemistry of Li ions in nonaqueous electrolyte for stable Li anodes
Wang, Z., Sun, Z., Li, J., Shi, Y., Sun, C., An, B., Cheng, H.-M., & Li, F. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01017k · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramasubramanian, A., Yurkiv, V., Foroozan, T., Ragone, M., Shahbazian-Yassar, R., & Mashayek, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-03-29
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 10237-10245
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2930678791
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.